XProfan

- Page 1 -

Hello IF...

an Possibility, on a service To come, would the rename of/ one own Files in whom Login Screensaver z.B. on CMD. the functions naturally but not under NTFS Partitionen (habs from the internet => not yet tested, will be but something write).
with Policies (only defined programs to permit) know I fine from, are really in the rule for hardly something some Hinderungsgrund - therefore work You in the moment too with of/ one NT-Version, and not windows95/98/ME Clones.
my Posting relating itself neither hereon, How simply its windows To cracken, separate that I it for extreme leichtsinnig stops, Privilegien - really almost the most important each windows Netzwerksystems - uncodiert in a Registryschlüssel To write.

me comes The thing so to, as would Microsoft quasi on The front-door Windows write here in the first Geschoß lying behind of/ one copy one Bildes with Sonnenblumen of Van Goch in a Safe cache a millions Euro. the House is thereby unbewacht, any Haustüren are open and only the Safe is with a fat Vorhängeschloß not zugänglich.

is no NTFS Partition present, sees the for me in the moment even so from, as would the Key for the castle yet somewhere moreover lying.

@Thomas - very this is it. an Firewall might in the system Account or in a Account with steepened Privilegien walk. Gelingt it by a irgendeinen ploy control a such service To get, is the thing in the case.
Each small Sicherheitslücke, alike whether in the service or in the Betriebssystem self, could used to be freely Access to these Key to obtain.
and there standing even yet plenty, plenty More in this Schlüsseln - uncodiert and then integrally without Problems auslesbar.
I must confess, in the moment be I it, the itself on whom head almost.
there standing in a Registryschlüssel here stand The Accounts and here stand The Privilegien. Dahinter is then The Number of Privilegien and each, the time something with Privs zusammengeschrieben has, quasi in Klarschrift each single privilege.
If I there instead of with Regedit with PA browse, see I even ex windows2000 immediate, for whom Account each String-SIDs stand. ought to one such a thing not plenty, much better absichern?

PS: On the Codes would so did i interested. time look, what it there yet for Tricks gives.

06/30/05 ▲

Guck it you simply first on: [...]

whom second, short code could I you to Profan umsetzen. with the be I me but not so sure, obs hinhaut. The first code working, but the installing COM on, than this successor of Ole. or I mach you a Exe, which in your Firewall enters. Kanns but not testing, there by me a right Firewall in the background runs

06/30/05 ▲

Hello Thomas...

best Thanks for Link, I will me soon standing. Übersetzen must You nothing - if I self übersetze, relieved me that the understand one Quelltextes. and I not understand can, of it let I rather The fingers.

<offtopic>

time biserl offtopic - The ham Yes only 1720 Members (means The .com) - the dismay me - I had virtual the are at least ten time so many!

salvo.

</offtopic>

Hello Thomas...

I habs me already respected. who as Admin Internet surfing, could itself there gamnz angry what einhandeln. The Firewall might then not any more come along, if the so announced virus its data to outside mail. surfing one with a Benutzerkonto exists in the rule only Lesezugriff on HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and the Trojaner can itself usually there not present.
what I meant, reicht but yet moreover.
there's since the so-called Chatter-Attack, The a service with designed Sicherheitsmängel moreover bring, code in the Account the Services to execute.
If you you of me beschriebenen Key once hither ansiehst, become You check, that the system Account there Vollzuriff has.
D.h. with Access to whom system Account must one not yet once The LSA API LsaAddAccountRights bemühen (no idea whether this Account hereon - means the Policy lever - at all grabbed has), separate can integrally simply its Privilegien without Umwege into Registry write. the would In any drop weg.
Desweiteren would it evtl. even possible, whom Registry Hive the XP for automatic Systemwiederherstellung abgespeichert becomes directly anzugreifen and To Change.
and How said, not only Privilegien stand there, separate yet integrally others things should there stand - of course in Unicode, otherwise but uncodiert. Since I over no networking verfüge and Windows2000 not at me on the internet depends (ächst anyhow integrally beautiful with 133MHz and 40MB RAM), can I unfortunately some things not to check on and say moreover first time nothing moreover.

- Page 2 -

[quote:5b0f35800c=iF]

<offtopic>

time biserl offtopic - The ham Yes only 1720 Members (means The .com) - the dismay me - I had virtual the are at least ten time so many!

salvo.

</offtopic>

[/quote:5b0f35800c]
most are so only landesspezifischen Forum, except the dt. lying also on other Servern. were though already time More, particularly in the dt. Forum. After neuaufsetzen having not More soviele announced. The concise 900 the dt. PB-Forums wirste indeed soon achieve

@Andreas: with of my Firewall functions not. with the of Norton does it well too, The Freischaltung by software. Have The option for already in several Programs seen.

[quote:f56c4ae6da=iF]and Why write You do not simply time one small Program the one Guest z.B. these (any) rights einräumt?

and How behave it itself if one Guest not even programs started must?

salvo.[/quote:f56c4ae6there]
Hello IF...

I must confess, that what You there written have can me not go. in the moment have I already a quite detailed Review of it, How so one View source looks should, the very the can.
circa my imaginations To testing and umzusetzen I will XProfan and one half-way vernünftiges WindowsXP system need. Both I will me first end this year do can. If you means in the next year mail of me get should and a Prog depends dran, reminded You you hopefully yet on it, why I it to you zugeschickt have.
so the what me vorschwebt functions, must on the Zielrechner one service with steepened Privilegien or Zugriffsrechten walk. this service must one Window having (probably the only wirkliche Schwachstelle altogether Betriebssystem). If I The thing correctly. see, might so one service really one Virenscanner his.
it'll not so easy go, but I think I get it there.

07/14/05 ▲

[quote:ea6bb4441c=iF]and Why write You do not simply time one small Program the one Guest z.B. these (any) rights einräumt?

and How behave it itself if one Guest not even programs started must?

salvo.[/quote:ea6bb4441c]
in the moment see it so from, as stalls I short before it this do to. an question all:
gives it a Possibility, on legale Nature and point with a such Program (means one Program, what the gesammte windows Sicherheitssystem lahmlegt) money To earn?
what would your do, if your The Possibility hättet, so one Program To write - need council...

07/17/06 ▲