| |
|
|
Jac de Lad | Hello XProfan.
since längerem Search I after a Possibility in XProfan Checksummen to create. the has most different causes, time one Y-Key from Passwörtern, time ne display for möglicherweise damaged Files etc. etc. pp. iF has Yes The mdx5.pcu online set, The MD5-Prüfsummen of Files create can. the was but not so the, I sought have, because I bräuchte indeed Prüfsummen/Hashes of reaches. unfortunately has iF said, that not so simply is. therefore have I time again gegooglet and a couple interesting things found. to that example one Prog, that 69kB big is and say and write 21 different Algorithms rule. If one times the differences between whom different Bitlängen removing sinds still 10 or so. however. unfortunately let itself no (Free) DLL raise. and everything else were any C-Source, The me naturally neither help on.
therefore here appeal: If someone what in the manner has, would I do not averse, it time auszuprobieren.
Jac |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/01/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| The Unit To rekompilieren isn't simply - Why building you not simply NEN Wrapper?
blockwrite mdx5 blockread erase |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Well, clear, the goes, but since Have I a temporary File. and the nervt. particularly with ifs several Megabyte big is. |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/01/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| I mean against ne Temp in $Temp isn't really what auszusetzen. If it mere around the performance went would ichs Yes understand, but so... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Well, It's all right me Yes around the performance. Also is it simply unschön. Something like power one not. |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/01/07 ▲ |
|
|
|