XProfan

- Page 1 -

Jo isses.

there has someone gedrängelt - means I did what necessary was.

salvo.

07/03/05 ▲

Jörg
Sellmeyer

super work! I find whom Text expressed well - not To very in that detail gehend but neither To generally.
so How I the see is everything crucial erwähnt. i'd only not BRD separate Germany write.
Greeting
Jörg

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

07/03/05 ▲

Hm understand. thanks for Feedback!

07/03/05 ▲

[quote:8dc919a010]
Quote of TS-Soft:

Hello iF,
is yes a bissel exorbitant your Regelwerk

What is one Massendownloader? Downloadmanager is in Firefox solid integrate (will be in none drop whom IE use), Have it but for LeechGet configures, I none buck on double Downloads have, because it abbricht or The Files only Defekt arrive. The clutching with my Settings with 4 task at the same time To, the it can board still well tolerate

That the IP-Speicherung is still blödsinn, must I means YAP switch on, for is Forum but something To lazy. Kannste but quiet make, solely the sense entgeht me completely I me Yes with Password anmelde.

an simple FAQ had it well too done. [/quote:8dc919a010]
to that Topic regulate: I watts almost already genervt which produce. means I did it. it was not my wish - but well then my task.

to the Downloadern wrote I the it sooner ums offline-available-makes in volume goes - means not circa z.B. FlashGet in the individual case.

That the IP: each (almost) board loggt these automatically - stick even in the SID. I have solely on it hingewiesen thats geloggt becomes - means Please not überbewerten.

what I but not understand - Why postest Dus me as PM?

as i in the (faith) Regulars table circa Help in the reference on The regulate bat - sustained I derartige Notes unfortunately not.

can I,may I these Discussion into Regulars table copy?

so could I prevent me each time from scratch To explain.

salvo, iF.

[quote:8dc919a010] Quote of TS-Soft:

Hello iF,
clear kannste the into Regulars table copy.[/quote:8dc919a010]
means if yet someone in the Nachhinein to the regulate gladly something contribute/say would like - here's the right place for.

salvo, iF.

07/11/05 ▲

[quote:dd9b753180=Stefan quick]Stefan quick wrote:
Hello David,
I have yesterday The new regulate the Community red. with two Things be I do not all right:

1. Posts are to that protections the Community as Ganzes einschliesslich yours Integrität property the Community.

this is a eindeutige Abtretungserklärung the geistigen Eigentums on the community, d.h. I must z.B. here pictured Source only yet with permit the Community verwerten, because tappt im dunkeln the new proprietor is. sure is the so not meant (hope I at least), however is it so not words. eachone Author has, of my view to, any rights on The of it verfassten Texts and it can unrestricted above order, this ought to too for these Community count and unmißverständlich klargestellt go.

2. advertisement for Own Homepage is To unterlassen....

If someone something interessantes on its HP anbietet, so can it still quiet above write and in the Text a Link lay out the hereon and on similar Approaches verweist, without The named Anforderungen. I feel it as Bereicherung one Link To follow and To see what others Programmer configures having. The formulierten Einschränkungen make these thing still sooner to a Fessel, The not necessary is.

How see You my Einwände?

Greeting
Stefan[/quote:dd9b753180]
to the Sources - its How always - The truth lying in the middle.

self-evident can the community not because of of/ one Phrase into regulate a Author its laws and of his Eigentums despoil - and so is it self-evident neither virtual. the see I How You.

here goes it around the byte in the Portal (what only random because it ne Proggercommunity is a Source is). If you z.B. here Sources reinstellst (or even correctly. many within one sortierten Systemes (means correctly. work)) should You hold from the regulate beschützt go the no hergelaufene Möchtegernhacker these damaged. therefore goes it.

it had less sense if here eachone Author then this Möchtegernhacker self run after would - circa this To sue. Yes one could even say: If I (iF) here with Beständigkeit campaign - then ought to one too of it go out can that I me behind The data place The here for everybody abrufbar are. and one ought to then too of it go out can the that here Dropped sure is.

The here geposteten Sources/Texts/Images/Whatever are at present into system property the Systemes. the schränkt but not The rights one Autors one.

On well german: The Source heard the Community - where here with Source The data meant are. the the community no geistiges property steal can ought to itself already on my own because of the technical and legal Unmöglichkeit from alone understand.

Nimm times the API-Library as example. The Sources has AH written - its his geistiges property. If however someone with malice aforethought for sorgt the The API-Lib here destroy/damaged becomes - so has it then but the property the Community damaged. because The API-Lib is nunmal here and becomes here gehostet.

Also ists still so - we're still here in the übl reglementierten Germany. I behaupte many the regulate the Community are möglicherweise sittenwidrig - but the Regelwert should finally too a gewisse abschreckende impact on possible Spinner having.
Bundesgesetze break Landesgesetze, Landesgesetze break Komunengesetze etc. - so I will say - selbt if I write would the geistige property went zugunsten the Commmunity - it would legally nevertheless not vertret/durchsetzbar.

to that part 2 (advertisement for Own Homepage is To unterlassen....)

>>Ich feel it as Bereicherung one
>>Hyperlink To follow and To see what others
>>Programmierer configures having.

and therefore - if someone a Own HP with for XProfan-Interessantem-material has - ought to it no trouble his from a Link into Community To chid.

One-Way-left were always unfair - but this is another Discussion. whoso would like can of here from a Link on its Own HP chid - accordingly shows it all XProfanern its offers.

differently around ought to it - for each XProfan the a Own Page has - self-evident his, too for Products another XProfan To campaign.

Perhaps have I you too wrong understood.

salvo, iF.

[quote:79beca6122=iF]
differently around ought to it - for each XProfan the a Own Page has - self-evident his, too for Products another XProfan To campaign.

Perhaps have I you too wrong understood.

salvo, iF.

[/quote:79beca6122]
this can so not pauschalisieren. there's completely different types of Homepages.
1. Selbstdarstellung with selbsterstellten Programmmen
2. general Page over my Progammiersprache
3. my News proposition
etc.
your Äußerung meets of my opinion to only on type 2 To. with whom others both Types wären these external left evtl. solid and Zweckstörend.
self-evident would for me, the You it whom jeweiligen Homepagebetreibern leaves

what tappt im dunkeln make or not, insofern has Stefan completely right. suggestion: Lösche this passus

in the reference on the Verlinkungspassus into regulate be I on basis the here erbrachten Posts bißher To keinem compromise ready.

TYP1 and TYP3 (to TS-Soft) are no reason on a Page To verlinken - already not at all if not even NEN Backlink drinn is.

I have the feeling here becomes something heavy wrong.

there's still none claim hereon the ever a Page on a others verlinkt.

The Community is so nice and bid however even Verlinken over mehere Opportunities on - The the Visitors self setting. bid a Eurer pages these Possibility too? And if - How would your react if someone behauptet one dürfe not pauschalisieren and it must still left because Perhaps ne Selbstdarstellung and the Own proposition on it displayed becomes?

I stops the for groben Unfug.

whoso would like can here on different because of here for its Page campaign. many go therefore on its offers attentive. If demjenigen it not even a Link on [...]

worth is, then is these Discussion from of my visibility vorprogrammiert Fruchtlos.

salvo.

Michael
Wodrich

time ne small technical question:

On of my Page are The Links in of/ one Combobox gather. is the really so aale, or would it rather (because of the Bots) a Own Page for left anzulegen?

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

>>Auf of my Page are The Links in of/ one Combobox gather.
>>Ist the really so aale,

self-evident.

>>oder would it rather (because of the Bots) a Own
>>Seite for left anzulegen?

Klares Yes. rather would it.

The .Bots warens time - but are nowadys not at all thick.

your Variant very Specifically - The .Bots go it index - but it'll whom left no particular valuation to the Topics on your Page ascribed. the against is eigendlich sense the thing.

The .Bots look z.B. even
+whether Links in Augenhöhe are!! (übl übl) -
+whether left well visible are!! (Farb/Kontrastrechnungen!!)-

One Link the z.B. integrally supra on of/ one Page is becomes as heavy counted - so deeper...

The Size the type the left as well as the contrast to that background is likewise entscheident lol. or whether a new Window aufgeht(rather) or not etc...

So I could here many many items enumerate - when one Link one richtiger Link is.

Eigendlich is the best Link one Link How I it under mach a link To community described have.

salvo.

- Page 2 -

Cyberangle

Hello iF,

I hate it me through one Regelwerk How the your works To must. but then too yet each rule single abzuhaken, the had still not his must. Wozu is then The rule Unwissenheit guard not till punishment?

I have me allso The trouble made and be The regulate 3 X stampeded, because the objectively 2 crux forget having.

would be I the community not so genial find, then I had me The work not made.

greeting Mike

Viele Grüsse
Michael

07/21/05 ▲

Well I say time so - there are regulate thereby The drin his must - and regulate of them so did i gladly had the tappt im dunkeln red go.

eachone scrolls Yes simply down and clicking on jaja mach already moreover.

on the others Page find I however the You somehow right have - i'll with the whom Check boxes rethinking.

salvo, iF.

07/21/05 ▲

Hehe I habs. I make The Check boxes simply of House from Checked.

salvo.

07/21/05 ▲