| |
|
|
Rolf Koch | iF, I had integrally gladly a exhaust or ähnliches, where I single Threads in a Ignoreliste settle can. select and not any more reading must - means integrally important: supra becomes neither More displayed, the one new Posting anliegt. to that example whom Chatersatz One Thread to that stupid piffle Have I no pleasure More over ands over again therein To disembark circa me Unterhaltungen between 2 Personen durchzulesen, which now really not interested. Time is hold nowadys concise |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Nico Madysa | we the Trashcan not meanwhile automatically aussortiert? (P.s.: but Please wenigstend new Posts so ruddy markeiren.) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rolf Koch | not ruddy Mark - if I z.B. this Thread on The Ignoreliste staid have, eachone others bekäm The Thread furthermore ruddy displayed. How Trashcan aussortiert? unfortunately No, because the Trashcan wisely Yes unfortunately not, what me interested and take off me futile Zeitverschwendung is |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Nico Madysa | No, I mean, Trashcan-mail müssten still now generally aussortiert go, or? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| have right Rolf, i think there on a manner consequence such Threads rather To Remove - where self The Admins no pleasure having therein To reading. I feel it too as serious as Admin each Posting at least once seen to have circa to that example in Ausnahmefall groben nonsense abzuwenden. If such one Thread auftaucht should it simply of a Admin entire removes go. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rolf Koch | is correct again, because otherwise would we any these pair ignore and aufeinmal would there rechtswidriger Kram drinstehen. and no Admin has it apiece red - fully zustimmend!!! Have not on it virtual. |
|
|
| |
|
|