| |
| |
|
Jac
de
Lad | How can I best The functions in DLLs Call? there's Yes numerous Opportunities (ImportFunc(), ImportDLL(), External() and Def). which of it is best suitable, if I to that example a row of functions the Shell32.dll use wants?
Jac  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/04/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | | i'd time say: If you many functions of/ one Dll benefit want (z. B. List view.dll), then with ImportDll. If it only few are, then these with ImportFunc integrate. You can Yes time Rolands Testprogramm in the Subscription run and yourself one verdict form. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...  | 01/04/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | | Yes, no, the Have I understood. it went me around the Sytsem-DLLs (shell32, comctrl an so on). |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/04/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | there counts the same. The new functions having Yes not only whom benefit, that tappt im dunkeln faster are, separate too yet safer.
in the individual case must one hold testing, ifs on ne Milisekunde ankommt. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 01/04/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(1.120)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia