| |
| |
|
 | I had before with Profan²7.5 worked and was with the Umstellng on XProfan9 from the very plenty more speed keen.
How see it with the speed of XProfan10 from? so How XProfan9, faster or slower?
Greeting
Andreas |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | Hello Andreas,
XProfan 10 is yet a Tick faster, as XProfan 9, so about around the 10%.
this is in the Hauptsache the Umstieg of Delphi 5 the new TurboDelphi 2006 To owe. in the Contrast To Delphi 7, the circa ca. 20% slower programs begot as Delphi 5 (and therefore not for XProfan in question coming), created TurboDelphi 2006 with equal Settings explicit faster programs.
Greeting
Roland
BTW: this is too the reason, why I OpenSource-Pascal-Compiler not really in Betracht ziehe: with FreePascal z.B. becomes The PRFRUN32.EXE not only More as twice so big, separate runs too only yet with a Bruchteil (!) the speed!
apropos: too for Profan2CPP ought to one on the (free) Borland C++ 5.5 Compiler zurückgreifen, there this to my Experience The fastest programs produced. |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 11/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | | @Roland: Borland Delphi 2006 is too explicit faster as Delphi 7. I habs with Parcival ausprobiert!!! |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
RGH | TurboDelphi 2006 = Borland Delphi 2006 !
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 11/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Aso...  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(1.118)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia