XProfan

- Page 2 -

Michael
Wodrich

[quote:c61d21d565]
[quote:c61d21d565]
Why means not

Set(P2CPP:...,1)
[/quote:c61d21d565]
2. XProfan would a such instruction with Unbekannter switch: P2PP... receipting...
[/quote:c61d21d565]
No, iF meant whom new commands of XProfan10:
Compile Mark Separation

SubProc Set.P2CPP

    Parameters ...
    ...

EndProc

und dann kann die neue Unterfunktion verwendet werden als:
Set("P2CPP",...on>

only time so to that understanding.

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

where me straight auffällt, the XPSE The new command Yes any yet beigebracht go must. A good opportunity for Präprozessor-switch...

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

[quote:25d48ad347]where me straight auffällt, the XPSE The new command Yes any yet beigebracht go must. A good opportunity for Präprozessor-switch...[/quote:25d48ad347]
some 10it have I the XPSE already beigebracht - I bemühe me too the the remainder not such a long time on itself Waiting can.

@Sebastian: I mean only the comments too such his stay should. I mean one could crazy go if one now too hereon respect ought to what The Comments imply. Ne ne, Rems with weight - the find I not at all well!

I faith another Solution must since, and not therefore because I the XPSE procure should The Comments To parsen.

Sebastian
König

[quote:4dc4baa0c2]there a Possibility The CPP Source manually so To Change as later by switch his becomes.
there it Yes still so a couple Problems gives (DLLs must by UseDLL loaded go, urlmon.dll functions with manchen left not any more, Hotkeys weg not) would I this gladly time try.[/quote:4dc4baa0c2]
Yes - clear

But something with difficulty: any External and Call between whom Schaltern müssten in External_ST or. Call_ST changed go...

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

Michael
Wodrich

and how'bout then herewith?

$DEFINE name: setting a circumstance
$UNDEF name: setting a circumstance back

this is still anyhow solely feed for Präcompiler. here can Sebastian then whom suitable names pretending, the uses go must, z.B.:

$DEFINE p2cpp_irgendeinschalter

so need one then too nothing new To invent - XProfan 10 has it Yes on board.

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

Sebastian
König

[quote:d6877f32d4]the Set(...,x) was that's all right - only ought to it hold of Präprozessor worn out go.

If XPSE now so a erweiterbaren commands bekäme, then could too any of Profan not understood XPSE-command there into.

$Set(XPSE,cx)
$Set(P2CPP,external_on)
$Set(P2CPP,call_on)
...[/quote:d6877f32d4]
as long as the whole in a comment standing and accordingly Profan self not disturbing is it Yes ok - where I The Syntax already almost To tricky find... ;)

[quote:d6877f32d4]$DEFINE name: setting a circumstance
$UNDEF name: setting a circumstance back

this is still anyhow solely feed for Präcompiler. here can Sebastian then whom suitable names pretending, the uses go must, z.B.:

$DEFINE p2cpp_irgendeinschalter[/quote:d6877f32d4]
really a nice idea - but unfortunately neither abwärtskompatibel To older Profan-versions

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

Sebastian
König

[quote:d01220718e]@Sebastian: I mean only the comments too such his stay should. I mean one could crazy go if one now too hereon respect ought to what The Comments imply. Ne ne, Rems with weight - the find I not at all well![/quote:d01220718e]
the see I really differently - and there's with the #!/be/sh too one right bekanntes Example for a comment-row with weight!

I find too, one ought to the whole not überbewerten: It's all right here really about a very Special Situtation, namely around the manipulation the Translation of External(), Call() for integrally defined pieces the Codes - possibly becomes the except Georg in this drop not even someone need... In so well How all Make is the integrally normal Translation this functions Yes completely aale!

If one this deliberating, is with the whom Kommentaren really the most beautiful Possibility, The me so falls in...

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

Michael
Wodrich

And if one with this Spezialkommentaren certainly, that before it no commands stand must - means to beliebigen Whitespaces follows the Kommentarzeichen with the Spezialbefehl - then can itself the too properly filter out (comments weg Yes until Zeilenende).
its then Yes always on of/ one row for itself.

I see the too as only Possibility for Abwärtskompatibilität - and the has P2CPP Yes on The tab written.

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

Georg
Hovenbitzer

[quote:fec088bf63]Yes - clear But something with difficulty: any External and Call between whom Schaltern müssten in External_ST or. Call_ST changed go...[/quote:fec088bf63]
Hello Sebastian,

if I it correctly. understood have, must I still only The Aufrufe The whom Error cause with .._ST slip and no define settle.
If this is correct are not so many

Viele Grüsse, Georg Hovenbitzer(Windows XP Pro, XProfan 11.2, Profan2Cpp 1.6a)

Sebastian
König

Hello Georg,

[quote:e363eebe1e]if I it correctly. understood have, must I still only The Aufrufe The whom Error cause with .._ST slip and no define settle.
If this is correct are not so many [/quote:e363eebe1e]
Yes, but so the Thread-context always is correct, should You as a precaution any Aufrufe in the Prozeur Runningie_gettext adjust.

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]