| |
|
|
- Page 1 - |
|
Julian Schmidt | Hi, how can I the receive one Klicks (or generally of/ one beliebigen Button) on a beliebigen Control intercepting and my Program self with of/ one function occupy.
LG
Julian |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
- Page 1 - |
|
| Z.B. simply herewith: [...]
simply z.B. in a subclassproc pack. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Julian Schmidt | hmmmm....GEHTS too without? I know me with Subclassprocs not so well from. but these Funktionalität should not of Program Start To end be activated, separate only designed Ereignissen. on the dearest would it me, if You simply time one code-example make would |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| probably would it plainer if you one subClassProc-example from the
Helpfile entnimmst - the principle is imaginable simply and You can Yes self
to determine when The Proc clutching z.B. in the You simply by SubClass-commands The
subClassProc on- or abschaltest. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Julian Schmidt | On what kind of lever relating itself whom my Subclass-Proc, hWnd? i want the if I to that example on a Button outside the program click, this program whom Click not receiving, I it in my Program though erfassen can. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| mean me, simply example look at -
is everything plenty plainer as that here. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Julian Schmidt | OK I know now How one Keys by Subclassing abfragt. but How make I it, the The Message not on others Controls sent becomes? CompileMarkSeparation |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
E.T. | ...would times the Question clarify, whether You The Messages of your eigenem Program or of a integrally anderem Prog intercepting want... You write only always of others Controls , there's it already one Difference, whether it it your own Progg is or one fremdes Progg |
|
|
| XProfan X2Grüße aus Sachsen... Mario WinXP, Win7 (64 Bit),Win8(.1),Win10, Win 11, Profan 6 - X4, XPSE, und 'nen schwarzes, blinkendes Dingens, wo ich das alles reinschütte... | 10/07/12 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Julian Schmidt | Eig. should each Prog. and each Control The Message not receive can only my Own. I thought eig. that I me to some extent verständlich framed having, as IF not any more to hooked has... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Julian Schmidt | hmmmm...well well. short Zwischenfrage can whom Keyboard-Hook too with normalen XProfan use. in the integral would it me wealthy if the Hook on two Controls which Handels me famous are angewand would, though it naturally his could the too others Controls this evaluate. so would at least the "SuperClassing" wegfallen. circa again everything on a point To bring: is the prevent the Weiterleitens of/ one Button by Keyboard-Hook a Control too without XPSE possible? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Julian57 (08.10.12)
circa again everything on a point To bring: is the prevent the Weiterleitens of/ one Button by Keyboard-Hook a Control too without XPSE possible?
is already often on the point brought. possibly Yes, but not absturzsicher.
particularly something like was one reason for XProfan The nProcs produce.
Calls on with ProcAddr bezogene Procs are not threadsicher if it no
nProcs are, Hooks produzieren nunmal APC's ( [...] ) .
small statement from the preface the help of XPSE ( [...] ): Julian57 (08.10.12)
Nproc-functions go in Assembler transformed, circa Hooks, Subclassing, Threads, Callbacks and all The items to program, with them it on Threadsicherheit and high speed ankommt.
the standing there Yes not because it peculiarly witty is separate XProfan-
Programmierern allows too everything else to program where XProfan
self not so heavy or suitable is. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
- Page 2 - |
|
|
Julian Schmidt | OK, thanks. i think i'll leave it at that. |
|
|
| |
|
|