| |
|
|
E.T. | ...to that devil's again get one one XProfan - Program not over 50% processor - Auslastung (o.k.: integrally seldom time 52%) ?? Have now time through - tested on 1-core , 2-core and 4-core-processor.
really should still, if I The priority hochsetze (where itself XProfan-Proggs not "Echtzeit" chid let) too the Program More Rechenleistung attached go, or think I there wrong ??
even if the PC-Dingens otherwise nothing To do has and "vor itself there dümpelt" and Windoofs nothing To do has : XProfan-Proggs weg not over 50%. If I there my video-edit walk let, then observe I correctly., How my computer slow becomes, there takes The software already gladly time 80 - 90 % the CPU-performance.
Why can the one XProfan - Program not, even if one it intense works or. rake can ??
Irgendwas can there well not mithalten ... |
|
|
| XProfan X2Grüße aus Sachsen... Mario WinXP, Win7 (64 Bit),Win8(.1),Win10, Win 11, Profan 6 - X4, XPSE, und 'nen schwarzes, blinkendes Dingens, wo ich das alles reinschütte... | 08/02/14 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Paul Glatz | by me can one XProfan-Program a core complete auslasten
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| can it thoroughly!
Try time whom FastMode -
The Nachrichtenverwaltung allows not 100% To benefit. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Georg Teles | by me not more than 16%
iF (03.08.14)
Try time whom FastMode -
thanks, now can More from XProfan rausholen or from the CPU mithilfe of XProfan ! |
|
|
| |
|
|