| |
| |
|
| - Page 1 - |
|
Rolf
Koch | Hey people,
In my Roc use I eh and apiece one Trackmenü on Apibasis.
since XProfan Version 11.0 I get as Return (alike, which selection i meet) always
-33 ! have today time with a normalen Trackmenü on XProfanbasis attempts and
here comes this Return Value.
As I said was is up to XProfan 10.x perfect and the values came correctly. on.
of/ one a idea? Roland? have You irgenwas changed, what To this trouble fit could?
Thx in the Vorraus. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| - Page 1 - |
|
Rolf
Koch | | muhahahaha iF - then must I except for a any comment ^^ |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | Hello Rolf,
You write, that the trouble too with Your API-basierendem Trackmenü appears. On the API-Call have I but To including XProfan 11.2a nothing changed. I tappe here completely into darkness, where since the ominösen -33 herkommen should.
(If someone with the first Alpa-versions of XProfan 12 derartiges gemeldet had, would me the less wonder, there here very tiefgreifende Changes present are.)
If you still somehow eion überschaubares example hinbekämst, would the naturally very help on.
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 01/19/10 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | clear Roland, i'm it too very schleierhaft. If one at least the value -33 zuordnen could.
but How I already wrote, ROC is so capacious and almost everything drin, what it XProfantechnisch (almost!) gives, where should I the an example take? its Yes How said in normalen Trackmenü so and there is everything integrally normal, How supra in Jörgs Presentation. I could for hours here Examples try To pinseln, it would functions. it's located somewhere in the grossen ROC on something anderem the bunny bury, with which we any not calculate.
Well remaining me nothing other spare with the Such and find principle moreover durchzuchecken. i'll then if I sometime time whom Error found have, telling for Why it lying. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | be the thing something hither come. Set("Fastmode",x) is it guilt.
set I the Fastmode to the Menu back works it.
a.) Roland, Why has it former worked?
b.) iF - or have You what so To do *lol* XPSE?
Well be on the right lane ^^ |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | | what I now unfortunately not white, whether You To this last Test already any ProcAddrs ausgeklammert have, The on procs show. I have of course none View source (xpse) here, have me but by VNC in Dt. eingeloggt and whom View source geschaut. an [-]33 comes of course in Header/ Konstantendefinitionen to How one too by Konstantinopel discover can, but even (unfortunately) nirgends where differently. but I have a idea, because You could where it possible is, if you not any ProcAddrs ignore like, in these Procs (not nProcs), on The by ProcAddr viewed becomes, one Return 35 insert. Perhaps. becomes then from the -33 a -35 and the Tübeläter would eingezingelt. ^^ |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | | will be I time try iF. Aufjedenfall is it Fastmode. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | I mean sooner "FastMode" is hierbei not The tatsächliche cause - schätzungsweise unterbindet FastMode 0 sooner a Folgeerscheinung. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | altogether Programmablauf is Fastmode on 1 set, Perhaps was is before so, that it ausversehen worked has. because it heist Yes, that z.B. interne dialogs not functions in the Profanhilfe. particularly likes I it Yes anyhow not, this Fastmode  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| - Page 2 - |
|
|
| | likes FastMode neither, need this too not at all because I with ProcAddr on nProcs show - I faith "stabiler" goes it neither and then runs it too utterly Fehlerfrei. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | there Set("FastMode", 1) Yes whom üblicherweise whom among other things between individual Lines stattfindenden MessageLoop unterbindet, functions some command/functions, The intern Messages use not correctly.
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 01/20/10 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | the meant I Roland, only The question Why aufeinmal. otherwise I had never Problems so and I nothing in these direction changed. set I How said to Menüerstellung on 0 works it and must but hereafter again on 1 to put, there otherwise again others Problems logischerweise come along.
Real comic. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| » only The question Why aufeinmal. otherwise I had never Problems so
I mean Yes, its Yes even not "auf einmal" - it shining only so. it comes of course "auf einmal" on "irgendeiner"/ this place to that Vorschein, but whether it objectively The cause is... my feeling says "nein". ^^
I faith neither, that Roland there ever a "Fehler" made has or what "geändert"/ installed has - we kennen still Rolands care. Roland says z.B. too ProcAddr is for ENums, means remaining first go ahead look, whether ProcAddr too really to Roland-manner only used and is unless, naja then Gibts hold z.B. "Folgefehler" or. these then even not to exclude. ^^ |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(541)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia