| |
| |
|
Jac
de
Lad | Hello iF!
XPSE is Yes ne swell thing, but is it Perhaps possible, that You yet some things integrate? I mean The new command of XProfan 9. smtp and co go namely always as uncharted displayed. Also has the part irgenwie Problems with selbstdefinierten functions and Procedures with $ end and what's more with Konstanten. Perhaps can itself there Yes what make. otherwise: moreover so!!! LOB!
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/19/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | naturally becomes in XPSE furthermore integrate.
Please be simply so nice and mach here konkretes example what wrong runs. so can I plainer The compel Changes einproggen. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Aaaaalso:
The new functions SMTP, ClassOf, TypeOf an so on, hold everything what in XProfan 9 new is, becomes as uncharted displayed.
moreover have I a Constant with the scenic names $Date declariert, then schreibts me, that the thing twice declariert be.
and self declarierte functions with $ end to that example ConvertBytes$ go as defective displayed.
Also wärs well, if everything Konstanten and by Def declarierten Konstanten export go would.
thanks,
Jac  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| OK - the Einbinden the new Keywords becomes naturally Done.
the You $Date deklarierst is and remaining for XPSE one verstoß against The good Programmierstatuten, because the Schlüsselwort Date is already of XProfan as function declared.
to the functions which You with $ deklarierst: the I will the XPSE well procure must. myself give none own function one suffix - there shake it me somehow. I could too none Difference in the Abarbeitung discern and behaupte the it unnecessary is.
But not angry meant!
To denne. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | [quote:793cdf3464=iF]there shake it me somehow[/quote:793cdf3464]me too, genaus How names with Umlauten for Proc or variables  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | [quote:040f63329a=TS-Soft][quote:040f63329a=iF]there shake it me somehow[/quote:040f63329a]me too, genaus How names with Umlauten for Proc or variables [/quote:040f63329a]can you only consent Thomas - therefore supported xpse too Umlaute not. (naturally except within Stringkonstanten.) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | there the Prog läst itself Yes nevertheless compilieren, therefore will be ichs well verschmerzen must...
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/21/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(909)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia