| |
| |
|
Jac
de
Lad | time ne question: The Listbox-list of XProfan 9 can maximum 262144 items grasp. Beautiful and well, but the maximum amount on Elementen is with %GetCount read. The Variable can still but really only 2^16 Save. now have I but in the XProfan-Help red, that LongInts and Integer both (!) of -2 Mia. To 2Mia. weg. can me the someone explain?
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 12/13/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | @Jac: Please no cover How comic?, Why?, so correctly.?, Hääää?. no Schw*** can then the Themenübersicht entnehmen what it in the Thread at all goes.  too ifs Perhaps only unbedacht was - so ists nevertheless impolite since the Admins here sure Hauptberuflich no Threadumbenenner his would.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Hi,
intern becomes Roland to a Long-Int using. lying then indeed on it, How You The Variable moreover verarbeitst. with x%=%GetCount go well only 16 bit transfer, with x&=%GetCount 32 bit... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| One Long = & is zwangsweise 32-bittig, logical
One Interger is so big, How the OS, means under Win ex 95 too 32-bit
this fact watts in XProfan9 too reality  , before it having
the Integer solely 16-bit, from compatibility or anything else.
means, The Help is correct, the only Difference between % and & is
the prefix, where one these nevertheless not mix must. I hope the
understand one so.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Hi,
[quote:d4cd8705ba]One Long = & is zwangsweise 32-bittig, logical
One Interger is so big, How the OS, means under Win ex 95 too 32-bit[/quote:d4cd8705ba]
I knows not, How Delphi its variables manages. but this is so not integrally correctly..
Native Languages How Assembler - the Yes very maschinennah is - make already a strikte Trennung the Variablentypen. for a Integer go Perhaps 32 bit ex Win95 reserved (4-aligned), 16 bit are but only ansprechbar.
with whom Registern behave it itself yet strenger. If I AX anspreche, so is it 16 bit big, not greater.
with the Parameter Passing on APIs and Dlls go against it fundamentally 32 bit transfer, alike, what kind of Variable the value commit. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | I see, so is my question clarified. Related to the cover wasn't bös meant. I gelobe recovery!!!
Jac
PS: @Frank: your old Avatar has me rather fallen! |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 12/13/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Michael
Wodrich | this is still Franks old Avatar, whom has it first to seinem leave rebuilt. but this anonyme gefällt me neither...
and with the the % and &:
the was me at Help-write too noticed. ex 32-bit windows ists hold something schwammig with the Bezeichnern.
The %System-Variables supplying but korrekte 32-bit-values back. nevertheless ought to one with own Speicherungen then rather LongInt-variables benefit.
Best wishes
Michael Wodrich |
|
| |
| Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt. | 12/13/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| means Frank, i'm slight in wonder, I speech of Integer under Basic,
is so old How Basic ansich. watts always to the Bitbreite the OS
certainly. because many people there confusion come are, watts
this partly default, or. new expressions made up.
but in Basic is the normallerweise so, where here not
eachone dran holds, weils Yes no Normen gives. but ULong, Long, UWord
Word are really eindeutiger, but since comes Billy and already Gibts
the DWord
alike, are both ex XProfan 9 same tall, but Michael has already
right. ought to one to Possibility so How former use. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| ...what everything moreover beiträgt that I personally à ¼ just how? XProfan solely for BOOLs mißbrauche. on the dearest hold by me The Longs there.
salvo. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Hi.
Yes, I use too only Longs.
@Thomas: Ah, You meant whom concept on itself. there be so did i for Klartext: byte, Word and Long say More from
@Jac: what Gibts To meckern on my Atavar? be even not sonderlich fotogen 
but you are too no MIB... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | @All: Hm, I probiers time from (I füll The list simply time fully and see, whether the still everything auslesbar is).
@Frank: be so did i not, this is agent Smith of Matrix! |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 12/14/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | alas Yes, correctly....  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(860)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia