| |
| |
|
Jac
de
Lad | white someone, How I of my Process The Prozessorauslastung read can, similar Taskmanager?
Jac  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 06/17/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | | onIdle=0%, otherwise 100%, means to the waitInput (or getMessage) 0% and thereafter 100%. between subClassProc Beginning and end too 100%. the on The Time neatened is your Prozessauslasung. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | | I see. but I faith hardly, that my Prog my Prozi To 100% ausreizt, especially since the several Kerne has. Also walk Yes yet others programs. and the Taskmanager gives always a worth around the 8% out. |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 06/17/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | If you time your Program analysierst , become You check, that it not more than for Sekundenbruchteile really whom processor charged. then wait it again on Inputs.
this Program lastet against it your processor fully from:
CompileMarkSeparation
One normales Program uses Perhaps for 1 second in five minutes whom processor really from - if at all.
If naturally Extensive Berechnungen border too More. means with iFs method can already a crude rating hinbekommen.
Perhaps helps you the moreover:
[...] 
[...] |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...  | 06/17/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| its How Jörg says!
additionally, The exakte Last knows not even windows - it does too only like supra described. the lying on it, that The Prozessoren in the meantime for different releases different Subprozessoren beauftragen can and not for each task exakt The same Abarbeitungsgeschwindigkeit having. Gäbe it in windows not different Abarbeitungsschichten so would the Taskmanager no globale Last Show can, it were then too no PerformanceCounter. The Messung can means only passiv happen - the can z.B. on the Taskmanager too integrally inspired watch. moreover comes the one really too again discern should between CPU-Last and Kernel-Last - hierbei can against The Kerneleffiziens (or so too your Programmeffiziens) herausrechnen.
The Performancecounter-Apis (Userebene) relating your data too only from Herumrechnerei on Kernelebene.
here too time interestingly: [...] (Denk you the Linux there simply lane, the machinery is roughly the same because it itself to Time schlichtweg so yields.) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Jac
I see. but I faith hardly, that my Prog my Prozi To 100% ausreizt.
and whether, if it not strain onIdle is, there windows (fundamentally) ready is schnellstmöglich abzuarbeiten...
naturally there hierbei (How always) X Ausnahmen, but one Print 1 uses (fundamentally) 100% CPU To it is done. 
How your board these Last against on your Prozessoren distributed is another thing...
and what the Taskmanager indicating is only a windowseigene Durchschnittsschätzung, therefore z.B. your 8% instead of 100% 0% 0% 0%...
small proof: Taskmanager can 0% and 100% Last Show - weder the an yet the others can objectively true his. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(454)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia