XProfan

- Page 1 -

Jac
de
Lad

and the Variable hdll& need I then, around the DLL again FreeDLL freizugeben??

and How is with the ImportFunc()? is The Variable there at all necessary? so far I red have is the The Addresse the function, the might only seldom necessary his.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Jörg
Sellmeyer

Jac

and the Variable hdll& need I then, around the DLL again FreeDLL freizugeben??

very.

Jac

and How is with the ImportFunc()? is The Variable there at all necessary? so far I red have is the The Addresse the function, the might only seldom necessary his.

the supplant quasi The frühere Login of/ one individual function with Def.
If you means a Dll only a, b.z.w. little functions benötigst, can it evtl. sinnnvoll his, these with ImportFunc(hDll&,name$,Alias$) einzubinden. before must You then but again UseDll bring into action.
If you yet (from whom Found too always) Call bring into action want, will need you the lever, otherwise is it probably unwichtig. I faith hardly, that one each functions again somehow enable must.

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

Jac
de
Lad

but its still umständlicher, if I first The DLL loading must and then unlock must, as if I Def take...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Jörg
Sellmeyer

already, but Profan clutching faster on The function To and is safer against Hacker protected.
Lies you time this Thread moreover through:
[...]

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

Jac
de
Lad

I see. but wieso is the safer against Hacker? even if The DLL static gelinkt is helps not, as they manipulating is...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Nico
Madysa

I Have the so understood, that most Hacker try, the program, during it expires, umzuleiten to a incorrect function. If the program The functions, The it need, already at the beginning zusammensammelt, is the unmöglich.
iF, Frank, Have ichs correctly. declared?

Nico Madysa

RGH

Jac

but its still umständlicher, if I first The DLL loading must and then unlock must, as if I Def take...

the DEF is Yes only a Definition. first when calling becomes The DLL loaded, The function carryed out and the DLL again entladen. once one The DLL-function or. others functions from same DLL often using, becomes The DLL unnecessary often loaded and entladen, what both relatively plenty Time cost. And if one The DLL-function only once Call wants, goes it yet plainer with the External-function.

Also there etliche DLLs with eigener Datenhaltung, about for Settings. These must to their first appeal too with Definition with DEF with UseDLL loaded and be to the last appeal again entladen.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Jac
de
Lad

I see, ok.

@Nico: nothing is unmöglich!

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

- Page 2 -

Frank
Abbing

If the Exporttables of Hacker changed go, after XProfan The Adressen the functions ensured has, guckt the Hacker into Röhre. Meisstens happens the but already to the Start the Profanprogramms, z.B. at Windowsstart.
I yourself have for my Tools The others Variante using, namely whom code the Dll in memory yourself To Change. this is not so slight To bypass.

Jac
de
Lad

But if the Cracker The DLL to the Program Start changes??

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Frank
Abbing

Jac, vergiss The Cracker-Hacker-Verschwörungs-theory. AH is not More.

Jac
de
Lad

I sags time so. Halo 2 watts only for Vista written, or. contains some functions, The only in Vista vorkommen (though it technical without Abstriche on XP weg would). but, there's a Possibility, the thing on XP to execute, namely with the wow.dll (windows on windows). this is Yes in the principle the same...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP