| |
| |
|
 | [quote:1eb605ea67]XPSE use I do not, because it me Unit-Nutzungen constantly anmeckert[/quote:1eb605ea67]question me each time of Neuem what You so my could. so How You it write ists but balderdash XPSE comes very well with Units clear. 
one ought to but no middle-aged Unitpakete and none middle-aged XPSE use - Perhaps liegts on it. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | Thread.Start not declared, Thread.Stop not declared, etc.
the bleats it me on, and fractures then ex. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| having we about forget the .Def-File with dazuzupacken?
if so - falls you The Message the XPSE not the it no .DEF-File finds?
too the ProfanInspektor need the DefFile with Units - otherwise can it not know the The command existieren because these from whom Units come.
you have means either a) NEN middle-aged XPSE, b) NEN altes Unitpaket or c) a&b.
windows 3.1 bleats by me the -2gb Ram To little are in order to works. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | Well, now white I at least, wozu these *.def-Files well are... 
XPSE werd I most likely nevertheless not benefit, there:
1. from the many Vorteilen custom I none only.
1.1 without Postfixe would Profan for me no Profan More
1.2 I am not To rotten, HEader einzubinden, if I into rare
Unannehmlichkeit come, APIs To use.
1.3 the others stuff custom so did i not.
2. Why with XPSE yet extra *.def-Files raussuchen, ifs without XPSE plainer
is what about me, as mentioned above, no advantages from it ziehe?
this is my opinion, i will XPSE lest offend or as Schrott bezeichnen(before it I will me guard!), but for me personally as individual individual has XPSE none benefit. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| no trouble.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | | XPSE runs under windows 3.1? |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 12/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(1.572)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia