| |
| |
|
Frank
Abbing | Roland, Why really:
waitinput 1
New feature?  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | Huch ...
1. The 1 is here in this drop superfluously and fehl on the Space. (I had there what tested.)
2. Yes, one "undokumentiertes" feature: If one worth behind Waitinput standing, becomes the Waitinput to this Time (Millisekunden) In any drop leave. Virtually (and technical) one integrierter Timer. one can in this drop means the SetTimer n% to the Loop and the KillTimer to the Loop dispense and instead WaitInput n% write. (whether the ever "offiziell" becomes, can I not yet say, I about Ereignissteuerung another couple ideas in the back of the head have ...)
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 12/11/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| @Roland
To 2.
...is a verd... good idea ! ;) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Dieter
Zornow | I use the Waitinput n% already some Time. it watts faith I
once in a Subscription-Delivery erwähnt, then never again but
I the as a Superesache ansah have I it me well Pinned. |
|
| |
| Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2 | 12/12/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | | Yes, a nice Vereinfachung. hears itself quite coherent on for me. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(940)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia