| |
|
|
- Page 1 - |
|
| The User Messages-Unit (Source is open) is for Programming of others Units - which User Messages need - Pflichtprogramm there not possible is of House from a single User Message To Remove.
The Unit can but only then in the program the desired Result supplying if too any others Units - which User Messages need - with the User Message-Unit works and the eigentliche Program ditto for management of User Messages ausschliesslich The User Messages-Unit using.
so one curd because a single User Message not again removes go can, and because one not Verify can whether a User Message staid is.
If one XProfanprogramm a User Message sent get - alike whether of outer or inside - then must these never lost weg there otherwise hässliche Konstrukte necessary are circa sicherzustellen whether a Message arrived is - or not. (example for hässlicher Konstrukt: a Loop The on of/ one others Message checks whether against a Message of actual Empfänger abgesandt watts) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
- Page 1 - |
|
Jac de Lad |
where we strain at Delete are: can I,may I again short DeleteListBoxItem number% into space throwing? |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 12/05/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| Jac
can I,may I again short DeleteListBoxItem number% into space throwing?
gladly, in another Thread! ;)
@Roland: now missing really only yet The Kleinigkeit the one determine can whom Antwortwert (long) the Transmitter of XProfanprogramm zurückbekommt as Result of Sendmessage on a User Message.
Simple example: If one would like the The XProfan WProc on The Message wm_activate with false answer (what now unfortunately you don't say so is) then ought to one CompileMarkSeparation define can, or to eachone others Syntax How z.B: CompileMarkSeparation then would it objectively to that first Male possible festzulegen what The response on a Message his should which z.B. of a Fremdprogramm abgesandt becomes. (communication of Prozessen among themselves)
the User Message-Topic would so slay and would completely new crazy Opportunities afford which itself letztendlich vereinfachend work out. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | iF
now missing really only yet The Kleinigkeit the one determine can whom Antwortwert (long) the Transmitter of XProfanprogramm zurückbekommt as Result of Sendmessage on a User Message.
the have You naturally right. the building I another, where I the second suggested Syntax benefit will be, there tappt im dunkeln flexibler is. one can leichter in the Programmlauf The Antwortmeldung replace. though kürze I the Funktionsnamen a little bit: SetUAnswer(MsgNr%, Answer%). is MsgNr No, there a Error Message.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 12/05/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | well, then back about User Messages: it go still some not relayed (z.B. if one Window moving becomes). Perhaps ließe itself there yet what make... |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 12/05/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Frank Abbing |
though kürze I the Funktionsnamen a little bit: SetUAnswer(MsgNr%, Answer%).
I suggest: Set(UMessageAnswer, MsgNr%, Answer%) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Jau jau jau!
@Frank: so can We also the PSDK in the reference on The communication with XIDE something abspecken!
@Jac: the lying well unfortunately on something anderem...
<duck>jetzt missing really only yet that the XProfan The User Messages first "auffängt" and the aufgefangenen first with/with "Waitinput" abbaut - so no More lost weg. </duck> (@Frank: then could we the ping-pong the Messages dispense and everything would yet sauberer walk...) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | iF
now missing really only yet that the XProfan The User Messages first auffängt and the aufgefangenen first with/with Waitinput abbaut - so no More lost weg.
OK, I have my lunchtime for a small, fixe MessageStack-Unit used and these installed. If you tonight (to the Eishockeyspiel the eagle) yet on are, can I you a first Version to that testing send. on the Syntax has nothing changed.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 12/06/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| Jawohl gladly! I login me simply by Schkeip if I at home be! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| I have me geirrt - there there yet a Kleinigkeit The my User Messages-Unit necessary power - and of course is it very necessary the one a new free UserMessage relating can. XProfan ought to the vollständigkeitshalber intus having. CompileMarkSeparation |
|
|
|
| |
|
- Page 2 - |
|
|
Nico Madysa | hold You the really for important? i think, The hand fully eigener User Messages can one Programmer itself too merken; or if need be in a Header write. CompileMarkSeparation |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | think not only in so small pathways, Nico. several hundred User Message are for a Program still thoroughly imaginable. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| @Nico: and what would if z.B. a Unit userMessages for itself Register would like without vlt. available To überschreiben? |
|
|
| |
|
|