XProfan

- Page 1 -

Timotheus

Related to the Subproc and the Errorproc is really berücksichtigt. Vieleicht could you Yes time any these Sonderformen from the Program in a extra File zusammenkopieren and look whether there the Error too yet appears.

With the whom Zeilenanzeigen I will time look when I the einbaue, standing but on the Todolist

12/30/09 ▲

Dieter
Zornow

The Error diving always on, too in Programs, in them The Sonderformen not include are. The question is How You count, If you instr() using must it zwangläufig To Fehlern come, there Proc too in Endproc present is.

I have my Testprogramm on The speedy integrally simple made and it functions

Compile Mark Separation

cls
assign #1,"dateiname"
reset #1
declare row$
var pro& = 0: var endpro& = 0

whilenot eof(#1)

    input #1,row$
    row$ = Upper $($ row)

    if (Trim $(left$(row$,4) ) = "PROC") or (Trim $(left$(row$,7) ) = "SUBPROC") or (Trim $(left$(row$,9) ) = "ERRORPROC")

        addstring row$
        inc pro&

    endif

    if Trim $(Left$(row$,7)) = "ENDPROC"

        inc endpro&
        addstring row$
        addstring " "

    endif

endwhile

close #1
assign #1,""
listbox$("Proc: "+st$(pro&)+"  Endproc: "+st$(endpro&),2)

Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2

Dieter
Zornow

Perhaps lying it indeed on pre, I use not, in the newest Version have I each crowd Lines thereby
so

endproc{||}

looks. So apparently not The first electoral. you have apparently a ältere Version, The Perhaps others Error produced and endproc simply verschluckt.

Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2

Frank
Abbing

pre building only Include Files together. EndProcs tastet not on. The same machinery (code is übernommen) wörkelt in XPIA, and the Have I daily fehlerfrei in use.

- Page 2 -

Dieter
Zornow

this is strange, I have each crowd this Endproc{||} in a pre-code and the must Yes pre insert, there in the Original something like How {||} Yes never vorkommt, there too no instructions for XPSE or what drin are. some programs are then neither More run, probably wrong together staid. it'll probably something verschluckt. If I one of XPSE begot *.enh File without The Endroutine with of/ one of pre begot compare, is the of pre small, though XPSE under Strich the same power How pre, if no special Programmteile on XPSE voted darinnen are.

Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2

Frank
Abbing

i will nothing bar, but knowing go only Includes zusammengebunden. with opportunity time standing.

Timotheus

means The pre.exe bastelt really only with the Includes rum and cut comments and Leerzeilen out.

the Why it lying becomes is this "Endproc{||}". How comes one because on something like, errinnert me somehow on a Smilie, the there hinten dran. I habs screen, in the normalen Profancode created soetwas too a Error, Maybe GetControlParas (B XPSe the Yes yet circa, in the drop müsstest You before yet The File with Xpse for normalen Profan code transfiguring. my Program counts one Endproc only then as Endproc, if The entire row (without space and comments and so) one "Endproc" is (The last 4 characters disturbing there means).

As I said, if whom Source one Profaninterpreter without Problems use can, ought to my Variablenprüfer too so get by, must You time look what it of these "Endproc{||}" there on itself has.
And if You none know what You schaust, look still simply time, whether You one kleinstes not funktionierendes example find can, where the Variablenprüfer really functions ought to, so would the "dem Error on The Schliche kommen" plenty plainer

@Frabbing: think incidentally I still one small Fehlerchen in your exe found have. Incs The yet comments hinten dran having, go not found, from of my experience out, otherwise really correct arbeitendes Program

Ulrich
Milde

To uralten Qbasic times there were one nice Tool, what a Crossreference Listing ausgeworfen has. After such a thing I had sought and be here over the Variablenprüfer stumbled. The is VIEL rather as one Xref Listing, where one first self vigorously dig must, before one on the Mist pushing, whom one self produced has. straight in the Eifer the Gefechts probiert one in the code around and thereby forget one gladly The Kleinigkeiten with Changes. If the Proggi then working and the Compiler not bleats, then there ex yet whom Variablenprüfer, the over something like stumbling could.

Regards and many Thanks for !!!

PS. one interested me still, is the now the Variablenprüfer or still the Variablentester...

02/09/10 ▲

Ulrich
Milde

Nochmal The Virussache: In 1.DLL hide itself all probability Yes no virus. nevertheless is not possible, whom Variablenprüfer by email with GMX To ship. About a others Mailer does it ship, but since comes too nothing on, because Web.de whom attachment not to that Empfänger weiterleitet. sure, I could with Password pack, but this is no lasting praktikable Solution. and the Elefantenfirmen the Virenscanner and Webmailer of a false positive Alarm through Generic.dx in 1.DLL at Variablenprüfer To convincing, the might almost unmöglich his. Perhaps is it Yes possible, The DLL something umzustricken so it plainer becomes, that any interested whom Variablentester benefit can.

thanks, Regards and tschüss!

02/10/10 ▲

Timotheus

thanks for the praise!

The 1.dll is the Prospeed.dll of Frank Abbing, have time geschaut whether it a new Version gives.
The there

i'll means soon time one Update with the verträglichereren Dll make and hoping the then still everything funkt

Übrigens: @Frabbing: How see it because with a little pre.exe Update from (see last mail of me danz under)?

Timo

02/19/10 ▲

Frank
Abbing

Yes, the Error becomes of pre created. to that Update make come I presently but not.
Workaround is simply, the Source must with 13,10 terminate, means into latest row one Return settle.

02/19/10 ▲

Timotheus

so, Update. closer Information supra.

03/29/10 ▲