| |
| |
|
| - Page 1 - |
|
 | Hello, in a body!
I have here several Questions speed of Profan² Programs:
1.
I have by me on the equal computer to Time four different Betriebssysteme installs (Pentium2, 233MHz - windows3.1 / windows95 / windows98 / windows2000). thereby is me noticed, that zumindestens The Bitmap command of Profan² under whom individual Betriebssystemen with (extreme) unterschiedlicher speed worn out go (tested with Speicherbitmaps of 640x270 Pixeln Size). under windows2000 shining The Testanwendung only with a drittel the speed How under windows95 To walk. under XP shining The speed even on one tenth To shrink! has someone similar/others Experience made? can itself someone these extremen differences explain? meet these Geschwindigkeitsunterschiede on others Profan command To?
2.
If the point 1. at all so zutrifft, How see it then with the speed of others , not Profan² erstellten Applications or. whom API`s from, The the same do?
3.
programs shine with the Profan² Version 6.0 twice so quick To walk, How with Version 7.5 (jedenfall The Bitmap command). How quick runs XProfan² really? faster as 6.0 or slower as 7.5?
4.
I have in my Testprogramm LOADSIZEDBMP akin, around the Testspielchen with eachone Grafikauflösung always in the same Size darzustellen. logical would here, that the Color Depth and the Bildschirmauflösung very heavy on The speed work out. But this is definitiv not all Rechnern so! How can itself the explain? lying the possible on the Grafiktreiber??
so, that I under Umständen on other Betriebssystemen with Geschwindigkeitsverlust calculate must, have I calculated. These extremen differences (under 1.) To windows2000/XP there can I me with my Erklärungsmodell on my own not hinbiegen - therefore here over again my survey... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| - Page 3 - |
|
 | very. The reporter yourself kanns not - the is sturblöd one reiner Auftragsposter. but I could the reporter procure the Optimierer  a Message To leave behind the one Thread wohlmöglich optimiert go must. The Optimierer recognize then same Postings from the equal person (here the reporter - or anyone) and would The Doubletten Remove. (If too as an afterthought - what moreover lead can the sometimes for short Time still two derartige Postings visible wären).
then should the Optimierer only yet whom Themencache prying and hieraus suitable Postings Remove. (only from DB delete reicht not) If the Themencache modifiziert watts could the Optimierer too same yet The erased Postings from whom abgelegten Offlinethreads rausfummeln.
At the latest if then the daily Inhaltegenerator whom Themenindex new aufbaut ought to then too into Inhaltsverzeichnissen the updated Content available his so short hereon there the Suchworteindizierungsbot itself which new valet can circa against whom Suchindex To optimize.
is me hold today not everything in a day been successful. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| - Page 4 - |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
(929)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia