XPSE

- Page 1 -

Nico
Madysa

@Nico: The NOERR-joint can for individual cases of pushKeyWord prevented go

Haha, I knew still, that it there yet something for individual case given - only, that I forget having, that the thing PushKeyWord hieß - thanks!

iF

alternatively could I one omen for functions invent which not angewarnt go should, something like How __.

and How wärs, if You simply ausläsest, which prefix in ImportFunc/ImportDLL indicated and is any functions with the ausgelesenen Präfixen ignored? the klappte then in my obigen Examples Yes with everything DLLs except for The Prospeed - then müßten XPSE-User hold with Import-x() one prefix indicate, a Einschränkung, on which even I gewöhnen could.

Nico Madysa

it name itself Tilde.

for me is a thing...

naturally I had already voller Erwartung on The instruction gewartét.

having To dwell with a Kameraden above already a bet completed.
means, you are already correctly. jolly, with you stay I

is one Forum voller joke.

mfg

Matthias
Arlt

Gratuliere to won bet

WinXP SP2, Win7 - XProfan 10/11/FreeProfan32 - Xpia

@Nico: so similar make I the with whom Units, only that I there also yet compare whether The functions from the .def-File coincide and the Difference the that prefix not of/ one Stringkonstante stored* becomes. the ought to but hinzubekommen his if the prefix on a . (in Worten: point) end.

find I anyhow somehow comic (but nevertheless too against verständlich) the Roland the prefix with import... in a String expects.

RGH

find I anyhow somehow comic (but nevertheless too against verständlich) the Roland the prefix with import... in a String expects.

the prefix is now time a Zeichenkette, So one String.

i'd though not whom point vorschreiben (Yes not even recommend). The Unterstrich would for this special drop The first electoral. The point part Objekt of method/quality or. class of method quality and has accordingly in the XProfan-Syntax a defined weight.
yet allow I in Bezeichnern almost any characters, but I have already the öfteren above thought, Bezeichner on letters (A..Z,a..z), Digits (0..9) and Unterstriche (_) To limit, where the first characters one character or Unterstrich his must. The worry around the Herzkranzgefässe some altgedienter User, The it bislang differently held, has me yet of it abgehalten. ;)

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

even if z.B. I do not always a class definiere - so einklassiere (I wished not klassifizieren write

) I nevertheless almost everything to this Syntax - the Overview because of behaupte I simply there are everything classes!

One example:

ogl.clear
ogl.push
ogl.pop

heard everything To ogl - How I find very useful and the ziehe I seither too in grösseren Programs so through.

one could means say, ogl be here to the Syntax a class - if too no real.

And if one z.B. a class DLL

any functions einholt, then lying it still not at all remote To say: thisDll.method

the not integrally correctly is, is me clear - against XProfan however not Objektbezogen operates How z.B.

declare a$,b$
b$=a$.mid$(1,10)

with which the mine principle insich against coherent is and in the working day wide praktischste usage found has.

the against virtually is that none (Specifically) of my Opportunities you on something (How z.B. The abolition the Punktes from whom Bezeichnernamen) detain must I me the XProfan by XPSE Yes on my needs zurechtrücke.

- Page 2 -

...attempt of/ one Translation the last Beitrags in that Deutsche:

even if not always a class definiert becomes, richte I personally almost everything to this Syntax from. Examples:

ogl.clear
ogl.push
ogl.pop

here heard everything to (pseudo-)class ogl. I find the useful and contact the in all more Programs on.

If one a class DLL (is the one joke?, Anm.d.Ü.) any functions einholt (einholt is really heavy To translate, presumably means the author extract, Anm.d.Ü.), then lying it of my Erachtens near, for thisDll.method To write.

Dass the in the senses the Profan-Syntax not integrally correctly is, is clear - XProfan operates indeed not streng Objekt-related, there otherwise the following example functions should:

declare a$,b$
b$=a$.mid$(1,10)

my Vorgangsweise has at least whom benefit, in itself coherent To his, and has therefore (as mentioned above) in my Arbeitsalltag meanwhile wide virtually usage found.

naturally should the niemanden in the Syntax retrenching, about if someone point from its Bezeichnern generally banish wants. XPSE becomes anyway both Bezeichnersysteme support.

+++

love editing, is correct the so?

03/26/09 ▲