| |
| |
|
CB | Hi,
have today time a interessanten Test implemented:
after Roland the latest Release of XProfan 9 incl. one small Testprogramm (Fixsterne) herausgebracht has, had to I the time try and I moreover too iFs XPSE to that comparison herangezogen.
AMD XP 2600, 512 MB, XP per SP2:
3,6 sek. /Xprof 8 with XPSE
3,8 sek. /Xprof 8 o. XPSE
4,6 sek. /Xprof 9 with XPSE
4,7 sek. /Xprof 9 o. XPSE
each in the interpreter mode.
my Resumé:
even if Roland proud is on The speed version of 9, XProfan 8 is as always faster, and XPSE setting with both another bissl what on it (number of times reproduziert with not signifikanten Schwankungen)!
iF, the haste well done!  
Greeting, Christian |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | and here time my Testergebnisse:
| Variante | X8 without XPSE | X9 without XPSE | X8 with XPSE | X9 with XPSE | | Interpreter | 4900 | 4400 | 4300 | 4200 | | Compilations | 1100 | 870 | 910 | 780 |
any indicated in ms.
i think the speaks fully and integrally for X9 with XPSE. 
salvo, iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
CB | here to that comparison now my Resultate compiled:
XProfan 8: 1160
XProfan 8 with XPSE: 1100
XProfan 9: 1100
XProfan 9 with XPSE: 770 
any indicated in ms.
Dieselbe Testumgebung How lastly described.
XProfan 9 to last Bugfix.
I have The Messungen 3x repeatedly, The Abweichungen were in the area of +/- 8 ms. from it have I the gerundeten story taken.
i will the time kommentarlos here stand let, but I think, the result is More as eindeutig... 
Greeting, Christian |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
CB | fabulous!
New computer (How under described), latest XProfan-Version (ß9)
XProfan 8: 891
XProfan 8 with XPSE: 809
XProfan 9: 609
XProfan 9 with XPSE: 593
any indicated in ms.
Roland has powerful on the Tuningschraube turned - and AMD too!
Ciao, Christian |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(644)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia