XProfan

- Page 1 -

Why functions because The command Windows with the Vorbefehl "Invoke"?

mfg
peter

can you time a small demonstration of your suggestion with Procaddr produce.

Thank you.

mfg
peter

Frank
Abbing

from the method rate I urgently ex, You attempt into deadend To flüchten. momentarily is ProcAddr To uncertain and can To schlimmen Fehlern lead, self under XProfan 11. straight, if You Profanfunktionen of Assembler from started want.

"Invoke" is a Call to a Dll-function or to a Speicherbereich. there XProfan not nativ operates, can you accordingly too no native routine Call. ProcAddr attempts the remedy To do, fail but in designed situations.

Frank Abbing

Hmpf, the trouble becomes simply not understood - this is not "unsicher". ProcAddr must only then not uses go if ausserhalb the actual Ablaufthreads one Call discontinued would. writes one however a ASM-function which a with Procaddr bezogene function aufruft and the eigentliche term the XProfanprogrammes because of the Inline-ASM-Aufrufes anyhow geblockt is, then is the even a good Possibility which I likewise often use - and the functions too very very reliably.

One Profanbefehl in a ASM Loop is means as long as no trouble, as ASM-Loop in same Thread happens and/or not z.B. over Timer injeziert becomes.

Frank
Abbing

Peter, should means unvorhergesehene items with the process your Program occur, contact you Please directly on whom good, middle-aged iF. i'm something like of out from the thing...

One Call on a with ProcAddr-bezogene XProfanfunktion must only happen if the XProfan strain "steht" - is really integrally simply.

One Call out a Inlineasm-function, The grade worn out becomes, is means unproblematisch. These Inlineasm-function must only not another Thread worn out go there ensured go must, that the XProfanprogramm too really strain "steht". therefore is too one Call by SetTimer-Api not To benefit, but Roland becomes sure too the still hinbekommen.

in the reference on Assembler is Frank but deutlicher contact persons I (in the comparison To it) herewith plenty plenty less program, but this Special trouble is Yes no ASM-trouble.

Sebastian
Sprenger

Peter Bierbach

can you time a small demonstration of your suggestion with Procaddr produce.

Compile Mark Separation

Proc Schleifenkoerper

    Parameters i%          Erwartet Zählvariable als Parameter
    Print i%,

EndProc

Cls
Var Adr&=ProcAddr
(Schleifenkoerper, 1)  Adresse vom Schleifenkörper ermitteln

AsmStart Schleife(Adr&)  als Parameter an Assemblerroutine übergeben

    mov ebx,para1        ; und dort in ebx wieder auslesen
    mov ecx,456          ; ecx = Zählregister (zählt von 456 bis 1)
    @@:push ecx             ; ecx als Parameter an Schleifenkoerper übergeben
    call ebx             ; Schleifenkörper aufrufen.
    ; Der Inhalt von ebx wird dabei nicht zerstört
    ; (der von esi und edi übrigens auch nicht)
    ; - eax, ecx und edx hingegen schon!
    mov ecx,[esp-4]      ; ecx liegt jetzt aber noch im Stack
    ; und kann gleich dort ausgelesen werden...
    loop @B              ; ecx runterzählen

AsmEnd

WaitInput

Profan² 7.0e, XProfan 9, 11.2a, FreeProfan32

Windows Vista Home Premium 32-Bit, 2.8 Ghz, 4 GB RAM

Windows Me, 1.8 Ghz, 256 MB RAM

and a Returnwert lying imho too (Correctly) in the eax-tab.

Jup, thanks.

skin tidy there and is integrally fix .

Thank you.

mfg
peter

- Page 2 -

where can The Sondersprungbefehle : @@ , @B etc get to know?
or can The of/ one here time explain?

mfgpeter

08/30/08 ▲