| |
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | is the behaviour so correctly? IOresult humoring FindFirst, even if The File No is, Error 18 from (no Another entry with @FindFirst/@FindNext). this is Yes with of/ one vorhandenen File meaningfully but with of/ one not vorhandenen File ought to still first 2 (File not found) rauskommen.
|
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 12/18/11 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
RGH | Yes this is so correctly. I make nothing with the IOResults, separate give moreover, what Delphi me supply!
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| XProfan X2Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 12/18/11 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | Hm - I hab's befürchtet. then is ioresult in the drop useless. |
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 12/18/11 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
RGH | Why? whether now 2 or 18 zurückgegeben becomes, The testimony is the same: it existing no (further) Vorkommen the File. in the FindFirst/FindNext-Loop Search I to Files, The the inputted Dateimuster correspond to. is this one konkreter Dateiname (without Wildcards), can only a File found or even not found go. in order to to check on, whether a konkrete File at all existing, is FileExists() To use.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| XProfan X2Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 12/18/11 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| even if not directly of these Topic something concern must:
speaks something against it just To Verify whether this XProfan-FindFirst "nichts"
(in the senses of "") returns in the drop the no File the pattern corresponds to? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | Yes, that's all right. Have not dran virtual, that it Yes ausreicht on <> 0 To to check on. |
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 12/22/11 ▲ |
|
|
|