| |
| |
|
 | If
CompileMarkSeparation Correctly 0 indicating - How comes then
CompileMarkSeparation on EINS? 
Explode irrt with same example forth: [...]  
If no BUG:
what uses the XProfanprogrammierer these 1? 1 for Yes, I LEN having there 2 Parameter - the wished I simply time with Ner EINS reward!? 
I see the Yes so: If the Number of characters NULL is can also one Delimiter from it not X Zeichenketten manchen separate only NULL Zeichenketten. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | integrally simply: Len() with two Parameters yields The Number of Teilstrings, where the second Parameter the Delimiter is. and there one String now never no String is, can not 0 get out, because a Teilstring exists one String always, even if this one Leerstring is, because otherwise would the String even no String. One Leerstring is definitiv one String with the length 0.
means:
Len() with a Parameter: length the Strings
Len() with two Parameters: Number of Teilstrings
but this is Yes not new, separate already since XProfan 10 so. it hold means nothing with X11RC8 To do!
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 07/10/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| your 1 is explicable - no question - but nevertheless sincere of incorrect type.
the a is so logical How the others - only The question what whom what uses. The gedankliche Hürde exists therein in the subesquent To discern: (adopted Semikolon as Delimiter )
between
5;;3 - where Teilstring #2 naturally one Leerstring is, but not #1 and #3, len means 3
; - where Teilstring #2 naturally one Leerstring is, likewise How #1, len means 2
- where Teilstring #1 no Leerstring is, len means 1
and:
- exception: no Content, no pieces - len means 0.
one look: 3,2,1,0 - somehow logical - differently logical hold.
Letztendlich is it naturally only a Verlagerung the Check, this is me already completely clear. but simply not exploden or lennen to without for Grundvorgang Abprüfungen To need means for me already on my own therefore frustration, because I know the it really unnecessary is.
RGH
but this is Yes not new, separate already since XProfan 10 so.
Habs befürchtet, on my own I werd many Codes run through must. *lüg*
i'm really the opinion the ought to at the latest for XProfan11 changed go. particularly XProfan10-Codes then less crash *scnr* and rather only in a Version problematically as in all subesquent versions. (just as naturally too the explode) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | I must but too say, that the Leerstring just as logical declared becomes:
5;;3 - where Teilstring #2 naturally one Leerstring is, but not #1 and #3, len means 3
; - where Teilstring #2 naturally one Leerstring is, likewise How #1, len means 2
- where Teilstring #1 no Leerstring is, len means 1
- where Teilstring #1 one Leerstring (but still one String) is, len means 1
everything a question, How to the nothing viewing. Bekanntlich are self in the absoluten vacuum yet virtual Teilchen present. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(910)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia