| |
| |
|
 | have your known, that the constitutional law since its Inkrafttretung in the May 1949 already 52 time changed watts ?
I have The Changes here time in a list box together worn. - |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Dietmar
Horn | Hello Horst, 
a round thing would it, if one not only entnehmen can, that it such Changes given has, separate additional too see could, which Changes the each very been were (before / hereafter) - what at least The Changes since 1998 concerns. because if I me whom actually Gesetzestext anschaue, then can from it not always entnehmen, what before there written stood.
otherwise a lovely Programmidee! finally time again proposition, which not The category Programmiertools einzuordnen is!
yourself bastele I already a while in a umfangreicheren proposition in similar direction (SGB and angrenzende documents). there would the program as Abrundung right well with reinpassen or. I have it now already with installed, so your work not so quick again verlorengeht ...
Greeting
Dietmar |
|
| |
| Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]  Windows 95 bis Windows 7 Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...] | 11/28/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | | Horst, is it so pseudo, that if one in z.B. Information on ESC pressing not only the dialog closed becomes, separate the whole Program? want I only time on it allude, because this might not so pseudo his. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| @Dietmar
Search already to whom Texten. is not at all so simply, whom jungle To durchwühlen and then too yet spare publish Texts To get  - otherwise thanks - One praise from Your Mouth goes down How honey ! 
@Rolf
this is naturally not pseudo - power certainly VISTA its own ways. will be ESC rausnehmen and a HotKey install  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | @Horst: super Program! you should The Texts maschinell vergleichen and the differences present.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| have the Progamm (Progrämmchen ) something modifiziert unf hopefully whom ESC-Error eliminating -
@Rolf - give me Please message
@Dietmar - if you the part somewhere install want, might a PRC-File better his. moreover supra standing tappt im dunkeln...
@iF - the Have I do not understands. selected Statement. what understand You under
you should The Texts maschinell vergleichen and the differences present.
?? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | | Host now is it aale with the ESC |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Hoster Horst... wow!
Program shining me correctly. To functions. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Michael
Wodrich | Texts maschinell vergleichen?
See here:
[...]
[...]
becomes z.B. in the Wiki inserted circa a new Page with of/ one middle-aged To vergleichen and the differences between both to emphasize.
Best wishes
Michael Wodrich |
|
| |
| Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt. | 12/01/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| @Michael + iF
have I the right understood? - circa two pages together vergleichen to, must both pages too existieren. - this is not the case. The data in my Tool in this manner are of me written been to whom Vorgaben from the small Paperbook constitutional law for ferderal republic Germany - this part can over [web]https://www.federal diet.de[/web] free order. (comes very quick) it contain the constitutional law with the stood of january 2007. in the attachment stood kleingedruckt The data, which I here verwurstet have. The Text is means only me and can therefore not one Nachfolgetext compared go. The List view beruht on one code ours Pascal and here go The data with the commands Add_Zeile invited. naturally had so did i a CSV-File write can. The would but slight with a editor To change been. the goes in the vorliegenden shape not, since the Texts in the EXE-File stand. -
circa on The Archive the federal government To come (old Texts reading) must one itself with of/ one Begründung Register. whom proposition have I set - now schaun mer time - helpful would for Weiterentwicklung one Druckexemplar of constitutional law from the years 1989. it would me namely (Dietmar too ) interested, what our mighty in Berlin to the unification so everything on this law changed and muffing having  - have already in the network sought, but without success. If here of/ one yet so one antikes part has, should it come forward. -
Puh - now Have I a blowhole on the Einfingersuchsystem-forefinger  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Christian
Schneider | here should the GG-Changes understand let: [...]
Edit: unfortunately only To 2002 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| @Christian
the shining very the To his, I Search
thanks |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(1.105)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia