| |
| |
|
Clemens
Meier | [quote:4a8af8dee1=Frank Abbing]Ersparniss: an row...[/quote:4a8af8dee1]
From because of a row, under Umständen erspart one itself integral More, there one first once a Flag settle must, circa in the While-Loop to stay and naturally must one whom Flag zurücksetzen, circa again from the Loop out To come. The detour over
CompileMarkSeparation |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | [quote:fbfd3c2763]From because of a row, under Umständen erspart one itself integral More, there one first once a Flag settle must, circa in the While-Loop to stay and naturally must one whom Flag zurücksetzen, circa again from the Loop out To come. The detour over
CompileMarkSeparation |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Clemens
Meier | @Frank
with the Case is it often not alone done and eachone Break is a Zwangsabbruch. but above could we now a own Thread eröffnen and diskutieren. The reason of/ one While-Loop ought to near with the While to find his, there otherwise the View source unleserlich becomes. The eleganteste Solution is even The Zuweisung directly at While, especially since with of/ one Zuweisung at the same time with True and False fixes go could, whether The Zuweisung at all successful was. was tappt im dunkeln not successful, becomes The While-Loop first none go through. our Programmierlehrer had to a structure How your said: this is as an box round the ears To distribute, circa first subsequently to the reason to search.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | now Better get going still offtopic...
[quote:207333087e]...eachone Break is a Zwangsabbruch... our Programmierlehrer had to a structure How your said: this is as an box round the ears To distribute, circa first subsequently to the reason to search. [/quote:207333087e]
no discontinue, separate one plunge to a others Programmadresse. of my Erachtens to The effektivste Solution.
the leave of/ one Loop by a Variable is slow and fehleranfällig, because ggf. following Programmteile not any more carryed out go can, once The Scheife exits go should. it could means further If-EndIf inquire necessary his, The a code ditto unübersichtlich make.
I personally write my code in lower case, where eachone Silbenanfang with a Grossbuchstaben begins. Z.B. EndIf or EndWhile. BREAK, CONTINUE, RETURN and if need be GOTO write I but complete in Grossbuchstaben, so tappt im dunkeln in the code very strike. is even my method, around the Überblick not To lose.
circa good programs To write, needed it none stare Limitierungen the Source code. I stops it for importent, its own Style to find and on it herumzufeilen, To it yourself as optimal felt becomes. One thoroughly langwieriger To never endenwollender Process.
and... teacher were me always unsympathisch. Dietmar horn except  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | mustard:
Franks Break is optimal.
@Roland: gives it situations in them one Break  in the XProfan10 not called go ought to - or. can bedenkenfrei from eachone Loop and if-structure gebreakt go? (How behave itself with Continue and Return ?) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | [quote:7956377d64=iF]@Roland: gives it situations in them one Break in the XProfan10 not called go ought to - or. can bedenkenfrei from eachone Loop and if-structure gebreakt go? (How behave itself with Continue and Return ?)[/quote:7956377d64]
Hi,
with the Betrachtung must we Return extra treat.
first of all To Break and Continue :
Optimal standing one Break or Continue outside of/ one IF -structure behind one Case . but self within of/ one IF -structure would it only Extremfall with very unstrukturierter Programming to Error Message To deep IF/ENDIF-Verschachtelung lead. (I bezweifele, that these Error Message apiece of/ one To face get, unless it provoziert the integrally aware. one should ca. 10 millions time a IF-structure mittendrin with BREAK leave, without The procedure, in the the happens, ever To leave. at that leave of/ one procedure, be it with ENDPROC or RETURN , go any Stacks on the status to entering into procedure shelved, so that everything, what in the procedure happened, forget and give away is.)
One Return can really without each Einschränkung everywhere in the procedure stand. The procedure becomes leave and the Stack again tidy aufgeräumt. naturally ought to one in the eye keep, that begot Objects (Fonts, Bitmaps, Icons) again DELETEOBJECT deleted ud geDIM th reaches before again DISPOSE d go. The begot reaches occupy otherwise until End of program memory and the three named Objects unfortunately yet moreover (but only right little). to all, if is a procedure very often aufruft, can the rasch To unerwünschten side-effects lead.
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 04/23/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| so can works...  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Joerg | Hello together,
@Roland: The Posting Although already 10 years old, but me interested, whether with the whom actually XProfan versions yet very so is, that the Stack aufgeräumt becomes, if is a procedure vorzeitig with Return or Endproc leave...
thanks and Regards!!
Jörg |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | Yes, there has nothing changed!
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| XProfan X3Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 06/27/16 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Joerg | ...lovely! thanks you!!
greetings!
Jörg |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(942)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia