| |
| |
|
E.T. | Hi,
means I question me (and you) now: gives it in XProfan really The Possibility, memory again spare To give ??
I Have started with Clear XYZ&[] , So one dyn. aray again on 0 To settle:
the XProfan-Prog watts in memory not small.
Sodann Have I in the Help sought, be on 29.5 - Dynamic Arrays with Structures bumped, and Have the too, incl. the Memory.inc, tested.
but too there no dynamic memory-management, the Prog becomes only larger, never small. 
The Profan-Proggs go with each klick on some element always larger, but never small, if I a dyn. Variable again Cleare . 
Have I there NEN fallacy ???  |
|
| |
| Grüße aus Sachsen... Mario  WinXP, Win7 (64 Bit),Win8(.1),Win10, Win 11, Profan 6 - X4, XPSE, und 'nen schwarzes, blinkendes Dingens, wo ich das alles reinschütte... | 11/10/08 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | windows manages WinXP? for processes by HeapHäppchen. If it nunmal not immediate relevant is, valuable found coherent already adressvergebenen memory again loszulassen, then remaining it first receive, and is with of/ one next inquire faster available. Aufgeräumt becomes if hardship on the Manne is, means a manner cache mere for performance.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(1.061)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia