| |
| |
|
Torsten
Rümker | Hi,
I have time a question The me so straight by the head shut is, as i the bundle for my first software gepackt have, The I public anzubieten gedenke.
i'm namely noticed, that I quite no idea have How one a korrekten copyright Vermerk writes.
Reicht it from z. B. To write: the copyright lying with Torsten Rümker.
or is a defined shape necessary?
MfG
Torsten |
|
| |
| Ich lerne, ob ich will oder nicht!
Betriebssystem:
- Ubuntu 15.x
- Windows (diverse)
XProfan Version: X2 | 10/31/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | 1. Yes.
2. No.
self one program of ... reicht from.
salvo. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Torsten
Rümker | thanks, the beruhigt me.
MfG
Torsten |
|
| |
| Ich lerne, ob ich will oder nicht!
Betriebssystem:
- Ubuntu 15.x
- Windows (diverse)
XProfan Version: X2 | 10/31/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
msgroup | [quote:847d625bfb=iF]
self one program of ... reicht from.[/quote:847d625bfb]
ahem... ne the is correct net... You can plenty program having - if I the copyright own (and the goes a program of not forth), can you plenty program having - nevertheless bestimme I, How and To welchem terms the part distributed becomes...
@torsten:
idR reicht one
Copright © year name, address. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| One program of ... reicht from.
this is therefore so because one automatically copyright of eigens-Hergestelltem own. one has too copyright if one not verewigt.
salvo. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
msgroup | [quote:a3d361f9f4=iF]One program of ... reicht from.
this is therefore so because one automatically copyright of eigens-Hergestelltem own. one has too copyright if one not verewigt.
salvo.[/quote:a3d361f9f4]
again, this is one irrglaube of you!!! following szenarien, The you the show. in all cut down can gladly one program of in the Program stand and the eigentliche copyright-passus are missing (is Yes net duty)
- auftragsarbeiten, where in the treaty idR clarified is, that the clients any rights sustain
- software, The in the angestellten proportion arise -> heard the employers!
- software, The vertragsbestandteil with a publisher o.ä. is and there one exklusivrecht exists! -> rights sales!
- if pieces the software through others copyrights/nutzungsklauseln occupied are...
only some of zig possible cut down... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | [quote:8557e0b176=msgroup]
again, this is one irrglaube of you!!! following szenarien, The you the show. in all cut down can gladly one program of in the Program stand and the eigentliche copyright-passus are missing (is Yes net duty)
- auftragsarbeiten, where in the treaty idR clarified is, that the clients any rights sustain
- software, The in the angestellten proportion arise -> heard the employers!
- software, The vertragsbestandteil with a publisher o.ä. is and there one exklusivrecht exists! -> rights sales!
- if pieces the software through others copyrights/nutzungsklauseln occupied are...
only some of zig possible cut down...[/quote:8557e0b176]These testimony is neither correctly. the copyright, To german geistiges property, isn't Übertragbar, separate only The rights on the product . In others Ländern likes The differently his, but here counts nunmal the German right.
Wikepedia moreover:
[quote:8557e0b176]copyright-Vermerk
The copyright-Vermerk (symbol „©“, behelfsweise too „(c)“, mostly followed of Rechteinhaber and of/ one Jahresangabe) or Urheberrechtshinweis stammt original from the angloamerikanischen right. with it wants the User one urheberrechtlichen Werks the consist of Urheberrechten allude. background is the old legal situation the US-amerikanischen copyright, to the rights in a Werk erlöschen could, if it not one copyright-Vermerk slip was. After the Beitritt the USA to that international Berner Übereinkommen to that protection of Werken the Literatur and art (RBÜ) in the year 1989 is the copyright-Vermerk today not any more necessary, can but to eigenem Ermessen staid go.
in the german right come into being Urheberrechte automatically with the Schaffung one Werks. One copyright-Vermerk isn't necessary. The Hauptzweck the Vermerks lying in the communication the testimony, that someone Urheberrechte for itself or others reklamiert. The Vermerk self lead however not to that consist of Urheberrechten. whether one Werk urheberrechtlich protected is, certainly itself alone to the law. further weight can the copyright-Vermerk therefore obtain, that one angegebenes date under Umständen Rückschlüsse on the term the Schutzfrist allows. though bemisst the Schutzfrist only in few Make to the date the publication. finally can Vermerke in the welt the Beweissicherung useful his. The Kennzeichnung stranger works with eigenem copyright-Vermerk can a Urheberrechtsverletzung present.[/quote:8557e0b176] |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
msgroup | @Thomas: the wikipedia Text is beautiful and well and urheber-right too... but IF You my fälle viewing, so bring you your right as urheber nothing, because the RECHTE to currency not you lying, separate with one anderem. and the entrapment is a programmier of nothing as sonic and smoke!
fundamentally circa time to question back To come of thread-starter:
one program of would I do not reinsetzen, especially since it itself too quite assi anhört... but what in any case mere ought to is, the name+address! Klaus Schmidts Gibts certainly some on the world ;) and in the Zweifelsfall would have the right Klaus prove, that the the right Klaus the many Kläuse is!....  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| it must garnichts mere  but it relieved whom proof, the one geistiger proprietor this Program is. I make it usually so:
copyright 2005 by Thomas Schulz, Berlin
whom place too only therefore, because it so many with my names gives 
The Kernfrage:
[quote:62216bb07a]or is a defined shape necessary?[/quote:62216bb07a]
No |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
msgroup | [quote:e60c334a3a=TS-Soft]it must garnichts mere but it relieved whom proof, the one geistiger proprietor this Program is.[/quote:e60c334a3a]
the my I Yes all the times ;) and this proggt of says hold not really what from. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Hey your talking both on Torstens question past. It's all right it not circa ever which urkomischen rechtlichen Konstellationen - separate just therefore with which it its Own software slip must.
salvo. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Torsten
Rümker | Uiuiui
there Have I Yes something in ambulation staid
well means I from euren Posts herauslese is means well the following:
1. one can, must but none Vermerk present around the copyright to have.
2. If one prove wants, that one the Urheber is, is But meaningfully.
3. The shape is sozusagen Freibleibend but normally is a Vermerk in the
shape of: copyright @ year, name, address (or Ähnliches to Personenbestimmung)
Have I the so vaguely correctly. understood?
MfG
Torsten |
|
| |
| Ich lerne, ob ich will oder nicht!
Betriebssystem:
- Ubuntu 15.x
- Windows (diverse)
XProfan Version: X2 | 11/01/05 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(1.015)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia