XProfan

- Page 2 -

msgroup

[quote:623e439825=iF]Hey your talking both on Torstens question past.

It's all right in the not circa ever which urkomischen rechtlichen Konstellationen - separate just therefore with which it its Own software slip must.
salvo.[/quote:623e439825]
I balderdash still no blow

Have still said, I recommend:

[quote:623e439825]Copright © year name, address[/quote:623e439825]
everything else throws only ask on and a omit find so did i cheese...

[quote:7b2fe5bd88=iF]Hey your talking both on Torstens question past.

[/quote:7b2fe5bd88]The watts beantworte, No hieß The response [quote:7b2fe5bd88=iF] It's all right in the not circa ever which urkomischen rechtlichen Konstellationen - separate just therefore with which it its Own software slip must.[/quote:7b2fe5bd88]with nothing must it tappt im dunkeln slip, watts too said
The only verkehrte response was these: One program of ... reicht from

[quote:3a1a4a65af]The only verkehrte response was these: One program of ... reicht from [/quote:3a1a4a65af]the contrary is the case and its ldr. not obviously with which You your argument begründest.

I faith Thomas forget the Torsten not The Weltherrschaft,

msgroup

[quote:a21c5e4242=iF][quote:a21c5e4242]The only verkehrte response was these: One program of ... reicht from [/quote:a21c5e4242]the contrary is the case and its ldr. not obviously with which You your argument begründest.

I faith Thomas forget the Torsten not The Weltherrschaft,

separate his copyright secure would like. the it the copyright on its Erzeugnisse vollautomatisch own - is garkeine indicated necessary. what it voluntarily hinterlässt is means his thing.

accordingly my argument: One program of ... reicht from. The others here listed Answer are of course not unwahr - but the context missing. accordingly sinds Answer on ungestellte ask.

salvo.[/quote:a21c5e4242]
even times not, rather if! DENN: if I one software product from unbekannter hand sustain, then would I already gladly know, who How behind it stick and who because ggf. The rights on it has order lizenzierung etc... and a program of is there simply time rubbish...

I faith too less, that torsten know wants, what it of law since leave behind must, separate really about wirksam its rights aufzuzeigen. and there's even nunmal The übliche copyright row trump!

Frank
Abbing

Hi,

copyright year First name name, Webpage (or Mailadresse)

the appear me on the sinnvollsten. to Beweisführung serves in the Zweifelsfall the Source.

[quote:76cba2ff15]if I one software product from unbekannter hand sustain, then would I already gladly know, who How behind it stick[/quote:76cba2ff15]as Begründung a personal Befindlichkeit aufzuzeigen corresponds to but not the Fragestellung.

The question was: Reicht it from z. B. To write: the copyright lying with Torsten Rümker..

the reicht naturally from, because even if it nothing writes: the copyright is seins.

everything else here Argumentierte basiert on personal Wish and imaginations and/or the Rechtsempfinden of not-Rechtsanwälten.

@Torsten: the copyright has fundamentally the author (Urheber) - too without each Info! fundamentally is not the it no Ausnahmen give can.

self-evident speaks only little against it too ausführlichere indicated To leave behind.

salvo.

msgroup

[quote:48294822bf=iF]
@Torsten: the copyright has fundamentally the author (Urheber) - too without each Info! fundamentally is not the it no Ausnahmen give can.[/quote:48294822bf]
again wrong, so is it z.b. so far I yet dran remember, prohibited, with the Profan-demonstration erstellte programs weiterzugeben -> ergo: no right to Weiterverbreitung! the Urheberrecht on the code has it, no question. but no right the Weiterverteilung the Program...

The Urheber has the Urheberrecht, but yet long no Weiterverteilungsrecht (KOPIER-RECHT!). this is one small, but feiner Difference... really is it none so small.

s. too The different types of open source!!! there can not simply things process (too unbewußt) and then one full-commercial draus make...

means Please not generalisieren...
Urheberrecht != Kopier-right

I faith, we've here now everything abgefrühstückt. I faith, torsten wished whom whole rubbish here quite net know, separate generally only ne info, what write can/must, circa it relatively sure To make.

what I wrote was:[quote:f697a2801a]the copyright has fundamentally the author (Urheber) - too without each Info! fundamentally is not the it no Ausnahmen give can.[/quote:f697a2801a]You meant:[quote:f697a2801a]again wrong[/quote:f697a2801a]on it is utterly garnichts wrong - be because - one rule The German Language less than I. I akzeptiere herewith on this Base no unrechte review - genausowenig How I it support would if someone attempts durchzusetzen the 1+1 same five yields.

but not hineinzuinterpretieren what Torsten everything meant having could - would I recommend very - and only! - on The Question Answer.

everything else is kontraproduktiv - particularly if on different Leveln discusses becomes.

Torstens question is already multiple answers - The momentane Legitimacy to Weiterführung the Threads is accordingly extinct and ought to not moreover serve falsehoods To release. Hierfür stops I but particularly your Vorposting.

through these Klarstellung ought to The Thematik exits his - be because - it'll of Torsten hither specify what it very meant.

there this bisherr but not the case is - and I for unwahre Spekulationen unfit be - see I inducement The Thematik as clarified To evaluate and would me forward if this too accepted becomes.

ought to yet Diskussionsbedarf To of my Herangehensweise or To particular Äußerungen consist - so Please I this a new Thread To eröffnen.

salvo.

Nachtrag: without it angry To my: I have Torstens question just as unkonkret answers How tappt im dunkeln set was.

One reicht from? ought to always The question for what? raise. there Torsten itself accordingly very generally holds - was my response too very generally.

To insist the my response wrong be - only because it different Opportunities gives in them The response not clutching, is vermessen, there it no allgemeingültige response on its question gives.

I Please means with my Answer something bedachter umzugehen - already on my own because here of me as Forumbetreiber delicacies in the formulation expects go.

Jac
de
Lad

Ähhm, if I too what say must...

Should not the following wealthy:

Program 1.0 of serious Müller, any rights at Author?

or so? so is still said, that the program not sales or in the order one others prepares watts.

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Hm there Better get going already spezieller Jac.

[quote:380f12f365]so is still said, that the program not sales or in the order one others prepares watts.[/quote:380f12f365]there be I I do not sure, here becomes sure msgroup something To say can...