| |
| |
|
| - Page 1 - |
|
 | Echtzeit - what heist the eigendlich ifs thereby circa software goes?
Echtzeit means NOT the something liquid or fliessend expires, or quite quick or slow. Echtzeit means for Programmer sooner, that it worry carry must that the program on each computer apparently in the same speed expires.
now Gibts but slow and fast computer, the a computer creates only 1 fps, another 10. If I means a ball fly let and say the it itself per Frame (durchlauf) circa a Pixel moving should, then runs the ball on unterschiedlichen Rechnern different quick. No Echtzeit!
Echtzeit means hierbei z.B., the one schaut How quick the computer operates - and the Schrittweite the Balles anpasst.
But this is not at all so simply - of my opinion to Gibts here different Lösungsansätze which but any to and detriments having. one could z.B. each second look How many Frames geschafft get, and the Schrittweite the Balles adjust. but sekündlich? Reicht the? No, it sees awful from. objectively must one look How long the latest Frame lasting - and each Frame The Schrittweite new to charge. but is the then always liquid? No - unfortunately neither. The ball would sometimes hopsen. means must one Dämmer since.
anyway, I Have the time here in this miniDemo displayed. the Window is skalierbar around the FPS To reduce - because the BitBlit need Yes longer (More cpu) so larger the window is. The ball ought to nevertheless, alike How big The anzeigefläche is, verhältnismäßig always The right speed stick to - so well It's all right.
I have to too a class built - heist FPS. whom Source Gibts later - if at all interest on it exists. The class have I me eigendlich built circa 3D-Apps - How z.B. WalkEngines in Echtzeit run out To let. Hierbei is it nähhmlich particularly important! the BallDemo is only to that Test. |
 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| - Page 2 - |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | so siehts by me from:
Results:
200x284=~806 Fps
576x354=~844 Fps
320x320=~821 Fps
640x480=~790 Fps
1024x768=~789 Fps
1180x978=~755 Fps
I can't say, whether I so one Mördersystem Have or You one so miserables but the Diskrepanz is but already vastly. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...  | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| | No my System is sooner normal - pciBilligGrafikkarte The but 3DAccel intus has. your GrKarte shining but for BitBlits ne mördermässig g**le Hardwarebeschläunigung To afford - differently can ichs I do not explain, because it shining almost as though The dissolution with you no role game. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Results:
320x320=~760 Fps
320x320=~748 Fps
320x320=~774 Fps
320x320=~772 Fps
640x480=~636 Fps
640x480=~627 Fps
640x480=~621 Fps
640x480=~618 Fps
640x480=~617 Fps
1024x768=~424 Fps
1024x768=~397 Fps
1024x768=~389 Fps
1024x768=~385 Fps
1024x768=~385 Fps
1024x768=~356 Fps |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Results:
320x320=~379 Fps
640x480=~66 Fps
1024x768=~26 Fps
1180x948=~18 Fps |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | my companies-PC (P4 1,8 GHz, 1024 MB, XP per SP 2; graphic: GForce2 GTS, 32 MB)
Results:
640x480=~48 Fps
320x320=~145 Fps
1024x768=~19 Fps
1142x956=~13 Fps
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Torsten
Rümker | so too time my Results:
Results:
640x480=~922 Fps
900x621=~910 Fps
112x273=~944 Fps
1180x916=~856 Fps
320x320=~935 Fps
640x480=~951 Fps
1024x768=~870 Fps
hope it helps 
MfG
Torsten |
|
| |
| Ich lerne, ob ich will oder nicht!
Betriebssystem:
- Ubuntu 15.x
- Windows (diverse)
XProfan Version: X2 | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | its ne ATI Radeon 9600 - means a with ordentlicher Hardwarebeschleunigung, but that the Difference soo ardent is...
[offtopic]only to information: Beschleunigung comes not of schlau[/offtopic] |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
|
@Torsten: 7 time gedowloaded or have You one Downloadmanager?
[offtopic]only to information: Beschleunigung comes not of schlau[/offtopic]
Ähem! Lol - naturally not! *ooops*
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Ówkeee - so Selbiges time instead of BitBlit by OGL.
Results:
320x240=~826 Fps
320x240=~812 Fps
640x480=~612 Fps
640x480=~613 Fps
1024x768=~245 Fps
1024x768=~271 Fps
1280x948=~58 Fps
1280x948=~59 Fps |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | by me with the Test:
320x320=~872 Fps
640x480=~808 Fps
928x731=~770 Fps |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | by me changes it nothing integral:
Results:
320x240=~861 Fps
640x480=~879 Fps
1024x768=~848 Fps
1280x978=~687 Fps |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Results:
320x240=~286 Fps
320x240=~267 Fps
320x240=~275 Fps
320x240=~275 Fps
640x480=~301 Fps
640x480=~325 Fps
640x480=~340 Fps
1024x768=~323 Fps
1024x768=~323 Fps
1024x768=~282 Fps
1024x768=~282 Fps
but I Have in the background yet program, remote geschaut and 2 Videos transformed... |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 01/12/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(1.110)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia