XProfan

- Page 2 -

Jac
de
Lad

Results:
320x240=~286 Fps
320x240=~267 Fps
320x240=~275 Fps
320x240=~275 Fps
640x480=~301 Fps
640x480=~325 Fps
640x480=~340 Fps
1024x768=~323 Fps
1024x768=~323 Fps
1024x768=~282 Fps
1024x768=~282 Fps

but I Have in the background yet program, remote geschaut and 2 Videos transformed...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

- Page 3 -

RGH

OK, now sit I To dwell on the PC (P4 1,5 GHz, Win 2000 SP 4, 1024 MB RAM; graphic NVidia GForce 6200 with 128 MB; TFT Monitor, digital)

BitBlt:

Results:
640x480=~36 Fps
320x320=~54 Fps
1024x768=~21 Fps
1142x958=~16 Fps

OGL:

Results:
640x480=~66 Fps
320x240=~66 Fps
1024x768=~66 Fps
1242x958=~66 Fps

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

...and so by me

Results:
320x240=~61 Fps
640x480=~61 Fps
1024x726=~64 Fps

there falls me only Murphy one...

GDL

Hi,

have too ne Radeon 960 and cancers too with 850 To 880 rum.

Hello
Georg

Windows7 Xprofan 8,9,10 [...]

[...]

Michael
Wodrich

oGL
320x240 = 61-125
640x480 = 61-112
1024 x 768 = 60-114

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

01/13/07 ▲

Torsten
Rümker

oGL Results:
320x240=~830 Fps
320x240=~851 Fps
320x240=~866 Fps
640x480=~892 Fps
640x480=~863 Fps
640x480=~844 Fps
1024x768=~856 Fps
1024x768=~877 Fps
1024x768=~876 Fps
1280x916=~877 Fps
1280x916=~859 Fps
1280x916=~870 Fps

and Yes I have a Downloadmanager, the really only einspringen should if I the wants.
having only unfortunately To quick moreover clicked.

MfG
Torsten

Ich lerne, ob ich will oder nicht!
Betriebssystem:
- Ubuntu 15.x
- Windows (diverse)
XProfan Version: X2

01/13/07 ▲

[offtopic]

and Yes I have a Downloadmanager, the really only einspringen should if I the wants.
having only unfortunately To quick moreover clicked. smile

i'd even recommend whom DWManager for XProfan.com abzuschalten, it can not faster loading as one SingleThreadDownload, but it causes the the WebServer uU 6time to check on must whether The (your) rights voices for Download - the charged means sooner.

[/offtopic]

01/13/07 ▲

Results:
320x320=~424 Fps
320x320=~500 Fps
320x320=~474 Fps
320x320=~494 Fps
320x320=~494 Fps
640x480=~323 Fps
640x480=~313 Fps
640x480=~305 Fps
640x480=~305 Fps
640x480=~317 Fps
640x480=~335 Fps
640x480=~335 Fps
640x480=~320 Fps
640x480=~333 Fps
640x480=~333 Fps
640x480=~345 Fps
640x480=~326 Fps
1024x768=~61 Fps
1024x768=~57 Fps
1024x768=~55 Fps
1024x768=~55 Fps
1024x768=~55 Fps
1024x768=~57 Fps
1024x768=~57 Fps
1024x768=~57 Fps
1024x768=~56 Fps
1024x768=~56 Fps

06/09/08 ▲

Jörg
Sellmeyer

jolly! now have I suddenly zweistellige Results:
Results: oGL
1024x768=~87 Fps
640x480=~89 Fps
320x240=~105 Fps

If I The mouse integrally quick move goes it on over 200. Perhaps still not The right Zählmethode?

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

06/09/08 ▲

Definitiv korrekte Zählmethode:
Compile Mark Separation

long tme=getTickCount+1000,frame

do{

    frame+

    if getTickCount>tme{

        print frame,fps
        frame=0
        add tme,1

pan>

what there with the mouse happens is naturally interestingly.

06/09/08 ▲

Alfred
Wagner

by me shining the everything same values to have

Results:
320x240=~299 Fps
640x480=~287 Fps
1024x734=~292 Fps

even if The mouse hither and thither moving becomes

hope the helps

WinXP-Home ,XProfan10

Alfreds ... Freeware : [...]

06/10/08 ▲