| |
|
|
| It's all right [...] from the last year: [quote:4f7a2e7544] These Chess.Dll - The as work.dat getarnt watts - for what is the still same very?
the Prog crashes without The Chess.Dll ex - means for what is the because there?
is the probably the Chess.Dll from the Borlandpacket?
salvo. [/quote:4f7a2e7544] I hope, I langweile not, but How one in the[...] of [...] see can, is it no trouble such kleien Mogeleien with TNT very simply nachzugehen (Real audacious). is The really of Borland? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | Yes, these chess-Engine was with previous Turbo Pascal Paketen (sure To there To Borland Pascal for windows) with thereby. it given to a Beispielprogramm for DOS and Windows (16 bit). so watts demonstrating, that it with Borland Pascal possible was, dieselbe DLL for DOS and Windows (16 bit) To using. The DLL contains the complete Schachspiel from the Überprüfung the moves on Korrektheit To there to kompletten intelligence the Computergegners. the aufrufende Program must only for screen-statement care. this lying as Source naturally in Borland Pascal with.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 09/16/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| best Thanks, Roland...
Aua - I again - the image, that I meant, is in the Screenshot none thereby . Habs under drangepappt. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | The Author has still never defrayed, a Dll installed to have. it know in the game Yes hereon there. and How I the see, deals it itself circa a M/TASM-Dll, not circa a Pascal-Dll. So in Assembler program. each with XPIA compilierte Profanprogramm contain a MASM-Dll, on it can I but not anstössiges find. as long as the author whom code yourself written has. Roland, have you got The functions from the Dll investigating and/or disassembliert, that You sure are, The mentioned Borland-Dll exist to have? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Hello Frank...
the see I very so - is already strange, the one a self programmed DLL of Chess.dll in work.dat umbenennt, or?(and this is definitiv so.)
who The DLL has, can Yes time with TNT too times the Exportfunktionen vergleichen (Have the original of Borland unfortunately not). not The usage of/ one DLL find I do not OK (even if one tappt im dunkeln not self program has), i'd it only not OK find, if one believes one could others on plumpe Nature and point verhonepiepeln .
the game find I integrally nice, the testing has me then plenty Fun made (because I Have each game won ).
Greeting
AH |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| It's all right me too none circa this middle-aged Thread, It's all right me only around the Info on you, the one plumpe Umbennennungsaktionen of/ one DLL without further understand can. (and now I will time hoping, that I not the only be, the not already jahrelang known has ). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| PS: whom names fetch itself TNT not from the Versionsrecource... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| The name can itself but too free from problems with each HexEditor Change |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| is correct .as long as it not longer is, as before. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | Hm, if the name but changed becomes, go The Dll-functions then in the Dll at all found? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| If you on the in the DLL gespeicherten names from are: is this longer as before, on none drop. otherwise see I in moment a reason, Why The not found go should - teste But same time. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Yes, go found. The Adressen the Exportfunktionen go in the DLL as Offset of which zero on gespeicht - having that here already time short erwähnt. The name is really not necessary, but the lever! thereafter accounts itself the place the functions (can with TNT understand). |
|
|
| |
|
|