| |
| |
|
 | | eachone with opinion must here Post. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Bernd
Haase |
and therefore it one judge fundamentally possible is differently To decide
the can it make. is only Schade, if his verdict through one OLG or BGH aufgehoben becomes. it could then occur, the the judge itself of/ one wailing because of Rechtsbeugung gegenübersieht. from this reason becomes übergeordneten judge in the rule follow done. |
|
| |
| Mit freundlichem Gruß Bernd Sind schon viele erfroren, aber noch keiner ist erstunken !![...]  | 07/05/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Hubert
Binnewies | of my Wissens to (and I crazy me bisweilen) is the Rechtsberatungsgesetz one remains from the NS Time.
sense the whole was following:
because of the Nürnberger laws durften Juden no Anwälte go, Anwälte no Juden consult and Normalbürger no Rechtsberatung manage.
Womit the jew to dish in keinster point a chance sustained.
The Nürnberger laws get to the war abgeschaft, but the Rechtsberatungsgesetz was no component the Nürnberger laws and stayed accordingly receive.
its right to exist sustain it by the thoughts that our law so bulkily and that the Gerichte through lay Rechtsberatung with on safety grenzender probability so überlastet go would, the our Judikative the Zusammenbruch threatening.
Hubert |
|
| |
| WinXP Prof, XProfan 9.1 Newbie
Ein kluger Kopf sagte mal:
"Nach dem derzeitigen Stand der Technik ist es unmöglich Programme zu schreiben, die fehlerfrei laufen!" | 07/05/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| @Hubert: therefore is the Rechtsberatungsgesetz for me nothing moreover as a ABM-Massnahme for all those which my itself for a Verwaltungstätigkeit überbezahlen let To must.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | Öhm, could you whom last set the Initialpostings once more explain? whom have I do not integrally understood...  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| clear gladly:
I
eachone with opinion must here Post.
the means as much as that eachone with opinion here post must.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | Hoppala, I meant whom vorletzten (The Passage with the asterisk before it ignoriere I simply time)
Dass You one so what but too so bad take must!  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | Achso - whom set - understand. now whom understand myself not. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | Hach Yes, this is iF, as we it kennen and (sometimes) loves.
@Bernd: I have Rechtsbeugung again with Wikipedia nachgeschlagen. because of one Urteils, that not vorangegangenen judge corresponds to comes one judge not same into clink. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | | To Begründungen are judge always obliging, there otherwise Revisionsgründe exist. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| I speech not of Urteilsbegründungen separate of Begründungen the differences To Prejudices. ;)
See my vorvorletzen set in the Initialposting. (this is the set whom You do not understand. ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | | Well then is everything clear ... except for whom set, whom I do not understand. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(467)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia