XProfan

Rolf
Koch

JA 100% zustimm!!! Rolfi too having wants

In my eyes comes one circa such swell things nowadys not any more rum.
since beginning on (since of my first Profanversion) had I howl can over the undurchlässige Waitinput (which but unfortunately the vernünftigste Wartebefehl is).
clear there's different Umwege, however what iF here vorschlägt directly of Profan from To make find I utterly important!
for me means flexibility:
One Profanprogramm standing in the watenden status without whom computer To load, can but nevertheless any functions thereby perform.
or such swell things How OnMouseOver - are very important if one Designtechnisch what make wants.
means: BIN DAFÜR!!! Roland Dive in *lol*

Rolf
Koch

and unless, XPSE iF?

clear gives Yes The Event.dll, but XPSE Have I Yes in the meantime standardmässig drin.

whom Hunni kriste later?!?

with XPSE would it possible , the but would then the program to that Fastmode paraphrase - and the against wouldn't really help if my ProcAddr

-Problemverdacht itself confirm.

(but one riesen hoisted would it already *grml*)

Rolf
Koch

*lol* and the others Posts a 100 Please by vereinbartem Zahlziel

[quote:79dedd6d31=Rolf cook]*lol* and the others Posts a 100 Please by vereinbartem Zahlziel

[/quote:79dedd6d31]
The Community undo me to this take action...

Rolf
Koch

Yes is correct again iF, means Roland DU MUSST

becomes it not!

RGH

Rolf Koch

Yes is correct again iF, means Roland DU MUSST

... but certainly not any more in XProfan 10!

and for XProfan 11 ließe itself from it objectively one interessantes feature style.

one can but but already now with User Messages any Messages intercepting: an UserMessage veranlaßt always one leave the WaitInput. with User Messages can the WaitInput means discretionary reaktionsfreudiger make.

and in manchen Make helps already The usage the MessageMode 2.

Greeting
Roland
(must itself sometimes force, first XProfan 10 correctly. ready To make, before it on XProfan 11 think)

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

09/10/06 ▲

Michael
Dell

there has one still (yet) what on what one itself forward!

Salu Michael...

Hab zwar krumme Fieß awer dofir e' ecklich Gsicht!

09/10/06 ▲

Uwe
''Pascal''
Niemeier

Hello people!

here one suggestion, whom I already end 2004 in RGHs Forum made hatte; the goes still too in these direction:

1. expansion the Messageverwaltung (I had to some Time Schonmal suggested)

there's Yes a row of Controls (z.B. TreeView, ListView, Header, Rebar), The Special Notify-Messages use, everybody can yet not process could. with the Opportunities of XProfan does it of course in the principle, but it has itself Yes viewed, that Eingriffe in diverse WndProc- or DlgProc-routines u.u. unexpected side-effects having.
alternative:

UserNotify Handle&, area#, Message1& [, Message2&, ... MessageX& ]
Handle&: the lever the Controls, which Notify-Messages examined go should
area#: The area, into The (mostly erweiterte) NMHDR-structure copies becomes, if a
the pretended Messages receive becomes. for ausreichende Dimensionierung is the users
Responsible.
MessageX&: The Notify-Messages, The ausgewertet go should

so could one z.B. with one TreeView without too grosse circumstances on TVN-Messages react.
alternatively could one instead of the Handles too The ID the Controls verwenden; then could one several Controls the equal manner at the same time to supervise (the lever becomes usually in the NMHDR-structure zurückgegeben).

SeeYou
Pascal

09/11/06 ▲