| |
| |
|
RGH | XProfan 10 nähert itself slow but sure the Release-Version. The next Subscriptionslieferung becomes means Version RC1 (ReleaseCandidat 1) his.
following Syntaxänderungen in the OpenGL-area have I yet installed:
The OGL-functions Bitmapfont and Outlinefont receive a further Parameter, namely the lever one with Create(Font,...) begot Fonts. The previous Solution with UseFont having whom disadvantage, that tappt im dunkeln naturally only funktionierte, if the OpenGL-Window the Mainwindow the Program was. so schauts now from:
FontNr% = oGL(BitmapFont, hFont&)
FontNr% = oGL(OutlineFont, hFont&, fashion!)
your müßt means any programs, The Fonts use, properly adjust. i think but, rather now to the Release another Syntaxänderung, as later the Kompatiblität because of a Krücke!
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 08/10/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | | correctly.. so must one with of/ one Betaversion still always calculate and this is indeed aale so. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Hello Roland,
I know, that You now not any more plenty to assimilate want, but here another faster suggestion:
Kannste Please a function InstrCount(sub$,string$) or so install, The The amount of sub$ in string$ angibt? the would class!
Jac  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 08/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
RGH | [quote:e847f7c82b=Jacob Liebeck]Hello Roland,
I know, that You now not any more plenty to assimilate want, but here another faster suggestion:
Kannste Please a function InstrCount(sub$,string$) or so install, The The amount of sub$ in string$ angibt? the would class!
Jac [/quote:e847f7c82b]
Hi,
the goes but already since a couple Subscriptionsversionen with the advanced len-function:
anz% = len(string$, del$)
del$ is the Delimiter between whom Substrings.
And if You know want, How often del$ in string$ vorkommt, ziehst You simply 1 of Result ex.
there del$ too several characters big his can, can on these point with the advanced len-function exakt the detect, what You know want.
Greeting
Roland
Nachtrag: with the opportunity have I yet a small Bug in RC1 discover: If string$ with del$ aufhört, is the Result circa 1 To squat. (too the Leerstring between the last del$ and the Stringende is a gültiger Substring.) In RC2 becomes this bow fixed his. |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 08/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | alas damn, I Have again what not mitgekriegt...  ash on my master!!!! 
Jac  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 08/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | [quote:cd9c27c713=Jacob Liebeck]alas damn, I Have again what not mitgekriegt... ash on my master!!!!
Jac [/quote:cd9c27c713]
therefore this Thread here. [...]  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Yes, you're right...
yet what other: How wärs, if the Compiler with of/ one Header-Definition, The in dern possible angegebenen Header-Files No is simply in a self-defined Header-directory to the Definition seek? so would one itself the $H save and should not always dran think, which Header now be installed must and which not...?
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 08/16/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
RGH | another small Syntaxänderung with OpenGL ex RC2:
from XPGLTyp becomes XPGLObjType. XPGType comes hinzu:
t$ = oGL(XPGLObjType, n&)
determined whom Objekttyp the XPGL-data with the number n&. possible Ergebniswerte: P, L, LS, LL, T, TS, TF, Q, QS, PY
t$ = oGL(XPGLType, n&)
determined The manner the values the XPGL-data with the number n&. the Result is a String, the maximum from whom four letters V, T, C n exists. One V for Vertexwerte is always present, one T standing for Texturwerte, one C for Farbwerte and a n for Normalwerte.
Greeting
Roalnd |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 08/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Hello Roland!
this is me already with PType$() noticed: I finss unfavourable, for such command as Return Value a String To use, because the Compare undgleich aufwändiger is, as with one Integer. of my opinion to wärs rather, if The functions PType$() and XPGLObjType one Integer give back würden; the Programmer white then from the Help, what The values mean.
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 08/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | Hello Roland!
i know, You want not any more plenty Change, but a klitzekleine idea Have I yet:
would be it possible, that the Compiler yourself recognize, that with DLL-Call The address one Strings indicated go must, means that it the yourself umsetzt? the would a large relief, there ca. 50% of my Programmabstürze in the Testphase on vergessenem Addr() rest. there should one only yet daruaf respect no p$+q$ or s anzugeben.
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 08/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | [quote:5b2f454c64]would be it possible, that the Compiler yourself recognize, that with DLL-Call The address one Strings indicated go must, means that it the yourself umsetzt? the would a large relief,[/quote:5b2f454c64]
ex XProfan can with APIs directly one Literal indicated go. so z.B.:
CompileMarkSeparation |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | [quote:b0d1d2239f]would be it possible, that the Compiler yourself recognize, that with DLL-Call The address one Strings indicated go must, means that it the yourself umsetzt? the would a large relief, there ca. 50% of my Programmabstürze in the Testphase on vergessenem Addr() rest.[/quote:b0d1d2239f]
Hello Jac,
this Error can You by a short Check with the ProfanInspector avoid, the in such Make whom Error E0010 (String directly on externe function transfer) reports... 
MfG
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 08/20/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(1.111)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia