| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | I find Yes The Variante from Terminator yet interessanter: someone from the future creates with of/ one woman from the present one kid, which then The future saving should.
Or always händeringend vermiedene Variante, that someone its own father creates, z.B. back into future |
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 07/01/08 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Michael Dell | Yes, in Timerider in love with itself the type too into Own nanny
@iF: If you you your ancestors entledigst and back come become You determine the itself garnichts changed have, because you have at best a new Zeitlinie (Zeitdimension) created with the You though (otherwise) nothing more To do have b.z.w. having become |
|
|
| Salu Michael...
Hab zwar krumme Fieß awer dofir e' ecklich Gsicht! | 07/01/08 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| If I then my Lieblingsserie Stargate(not only because of the Samanta = Amanda Tapping ;) ) in that area lead must: here becomes with one accident the General yet as junger Leutnant to that rescuers, because it with Sam a wound recognize and your a slips of paper on itself self written already before mitgibt. it known means as einziger of accident in the Time ! - is still horny or
PS: thanks for new eingerichteten Thread. one observes still, that so some here SciFi-fans are (of Frank knows I the already long ) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing |
@iF: If you you your ancestors entledigst and back come become You determine the itself garnichts changed have, because you have at best a new Zeitlinie (Zeitdimension) created with the You though (otherwise) nothing more To do have b.z.w. having become
The Multiversum-theory, the I ditto anhänge.
it'll never Zeitreisen give, otherwise had one sure already of seltsamen Begebenheiten heard, The in these direction explain would. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Frank Abbing
it'll never Zeitreisen give, otherwise had one sure already of seltsamen Begebenheiten heard, The in these direction explain would.
the against faith I with this Begründung not, adopted one becomes travel of 2050 to 2040 - so becomes of course today of it nothing famous his but for Perhaps later...
Perhaps can later in a/The past tense look (vlt. even errechnet) - the would too a Zeitreise from the one of course today not hears - these but nevertheless happens(e) (is). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | who The Possibility to that travel has, the dull itself sure not defined Zeitepochen. The Geschichtsbücher are written, means müssten Changes thoroughly strike. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Frank Abbing
The Geschichtsbücher are written, means müssten Changes thoroughly strike.
Ähäm, this is one Widerspruch insich, because a) The small period of time The You as written bezeichnest is Perhaps completely default of later Zeitreisenden (vlt. too to safety because we yet To stupid are) and b) there's not EINE story which whom Geschichtsbüchern To entnehmen would. wants heissen - Geschichtsbücher are so inaccurate that this Zeitreisen not ausschliesst, with which your argument under no circumstance a Untermauerung his can separate Perhaps even in the contrary. mere The existence of Geschichtsbüchern which any not equal (even if tappt im dunkeln itself here and there kreuzen) is no proof of ausgebliebene Zeitreisen. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Frank Abbing
who The Possibility to that travel has, the dull itself sure not defined Zeitepochen.
If no train into Desert drives becomes one well no ticket for buy can. i'd never insist want the - if Zeitreisen (in which shape too always) possible are - the one then too always same everywhere there travel can. there's imho no Beförderungsmittel the always everywhere unrestricted transport can. so are certainly the later possible Zeitreisen too on border tied. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| I can too present, the we for our own Zeitreisen a catalytic converter need could. Diesen must we first invent (ok, made up is it Yes at the latest now) and building and pursued take. Perhaps can we then within which radius of action travel. (what Yes today already goes, each shape the take z.B. video / Audio is Yes somehow the capture of Gegebenheiten to a designed Time - which we to a others Time wiedergeben (means travel) can.)
hey, here should first a Genauigkeitsdefinition since ex when a Zeitreise stattfand. If I z.B. on something remember is it too a shape the Zeitreise - only hold a very ungenaue. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
If I z.B. on something remember is it too a shape the Zeitreise - only hold a very ungenaue.
here lying of my opinion to the dog bury. we can us in the Normalfalle To into boyhood back remind. this is a Zeitreise. Seltsamerweise remind itself two Humans, which the same erlebt having never same on the Geschehene. it comes Perhaps on The used energy for recollection on?! - everything naturally mere theoretical |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing |
and b) there's not EINE story which whom Geschichtsbüchern To entnehmen would. wants heissen - Geschichtsbücher are so inaccurate that this Zeitreisen not ausschliesst,
many Events are but except for whom day very hinterlegt, z.B. diverse slaughter or christliche Events. stories and Events go more or less very since almost 10000 years documents and this is certainly the interessanteste epoch, The it itself rewards as Zeitreisender To explore.
What is with Funden? Zeitreisende would things lose, The sometime found go would. allegedly has the vatican Yes items under Verschluss, The possible not from the found Zeitepoche stammen could. i want the but bezweifeln. |
|
|
| |
|
|