XProfan

- Page 3 -

Sebastian
König

is correct - had I directly so make should...

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

04/01/08 ▲

Christian
Schneider

time ne small Why stay: I personally would find it from gegebenem Anlass super if too screen would, whether a function by importfunc whom equal names has as an Proc (has me yesterday 3 hours sleep cost[ed] ;) ). The Interpreter has it yet geschluckt, but in the Runtime was then Schluss - otherwise wärs me probably directly noticed. Perhaps can the inspector others in future this (admittedly stupid) Error save

XProfan 11| Vista(64) SP2

04/01/08 ▲

Michael
Wodrich

so stupid is the none.
think we there simply at times ImportDLL.

with many functions can always time a thereby his, The already present is.

or in the Help one large shield hang up:

though the Alias too one Leerstring his must, should tappt im dunkeln from gesundheitlichen Found NOT hereon dispense.

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

P.s.: sometimes is the Sig-Generator yes a richtiger joker - stood there still drunter: XProfan mobbt you not!

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

04/01/08 ▲

RGH

Hi,
with ImportDLL becomes the Profan-+ Edit but little report can, there it Yes not absolutely white, which functions in a to Laufzeit the Program loaded DLL drin his go.
from very this reason is in XProfan 11 The Error Message function No! indeed first to Laufzeit and not already How yet at Compilieren.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

04/02/08 ▲

Sebastian
König

there was Roland faster as i and has naturally completely right...

which functions present are, white one in the doing first to Laufzeit the program and can by the + Edit, the Yes quasi on the plain the Compilers operates, not fixes go. (from the equal reason becomes incidentally The Message E0020 complete deaktiviert, if somewhere in the code one ImportFunc() or ImportDLL() standing.)

an small Possibility to Überprüfung falls me though one: If with one ImportFunc() for names the function one Literal transfer becomes (what well the Normalfall his might - who generiert such names already to Laufzeit?), could this in the principle by the + Edit examined and ggf. a W0012-Message created go. i'll me time therefore concern...

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

04/02/08 ▲

Sebastian
König

another Nachtrag To Michaels Posting: If one not straight a great many functions a DLL needed, would I recommend, The really required particular with ImportFunc() To left, there for each appeal always a list with all vorhandenen functions search go must. and the Search in small lists is naturally always faster...

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

04/02/08 ▲

Dieter
Zornow

I have straight fixes, that the + Edit in a Program with Procs in Proc one fehlendes Endif not recognize. it reports instead Endproc unerwarter, Error in the structure.

Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2

07/19/08 ▲

Sebastian
König

Dieter Zornow

I have straight fixes, that the + Edit in a Program with Procs in Proc one fehlendes Endif not recognize. it reports instead Endproc unerwarter, Error in the structure.

Hello Dieter,

thanks for Info! i'll time look over, what there schiefläuft.

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

07/19/08 ▲

Sebastian
König

Nachtrag: as i whom Error straight understand wished, fell me on, that The Message so probably even aale is... it'll always The instruction moniert, The unexpected auftaucht. in the subesquent example would the "endproc unexpected."

Compile Mark Separation

proc Test

    parameters a%

    if a% = 1

        return 123

    endproc

corresponds to the vaguely the situation in Your code, Dieter?

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

Dieter
Zornow

Yes The situation is vaguely The same, I have only yet procs in Proc

i think but the Message isn't correctly.. first should it check, that at terminate the Proc the Endif missing, this Error should it already monieren if it To endproc comes. so white one Yes not where the Error aufgetreten is and seek and seek. In more Programs can itself whom wolf search. to that Happiness observes XProfan, that the Endif missing, so one whom Error quick finds. The Message the Inspectors is against it misleading and of my opinion to wrong, there the whom first Error übersieht.

Greeting

Dieter

Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2

Sebastian
König

Dieter Zornow

The manner the Message yields itself from the Nature and point, How to the Error sought becomes (Stack for all Blöcke; with one end...-commands becomes geguckt, whether it to actually pointed the Stacks fit). If the if-block in the example still in of/ one Loop include would, would one as error "endwhile unerwartet" get...

as Solution could I additional yet Show, which manner of instruction instead expects becomes (The information standing Yes available). what hold You from the suggestion?

MfG

Sebastian

P.s.: me falls straight one, that this Info with of/ one longer list of "... unerwartet"-informations only for first entry meaningfully is. in the actually Version is it Yes so, that one Error in the Verschachtelung under Umständen a whole tail such informations to itself zieht. best change I this not very good sinnvolle behaviour same with...

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

Dieter
Zornow

Yes a Message How

"endproc unexpected, Endif erwartet" would Klarheit create.

Greeting

Dieter

Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2