| |
| |
|
Sebastian
König | Hello Community,
I have finally again little Time (and silence) and work now on the completion of Profan2Cpp 1.5a, in the then The extensions of XProfan 9.1 implementiert his go.
too whom Syntax-Check would I happy times again little strain. unfortunately be I right einfallslos, if it therefore goes, wonach one yet scannen could  - most extensions emerged to concrete indicate items, The the Check go through can...
therefore simply time here The question: has someone yet ideas for extensions or. is somebody something noticed, what the Syntax-Check (or ProfanInpector) not bemängelt, though it To Problemen lead?
MfG
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]  Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | so correctly. fanciful be I there too integrally and not at all.
it would but of large benefit if the + Edit too as Consolenvariante vorläge circa Warnungen auszugeben, accordingly the XPSE whom inspector (with by the Programmer gesetztem Kompilerschalter) simply Call could and the expenses with in the Konsolenfenster disembark would. (z.B. How with XPIA)
the has for Endkunden well not only whom benefit the everything in a step happens, separate The expenses too yet a IDE out transcribed go can. (then Gibts not any more for each Zusatzprogramm one own Logfile, separate ONE CompilerLog, which either in the Konsole, or in such one IDE-Window displayed would.)
then would it too very plenty plainer whom inspector simply over each Sourcecode drüberlaufen To let, because it could Yes even automatically occur. (what a) The Codes correct and b) whom inspector often in appearance zurück ließe.) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | Hello iF,
is correct - good idea!
About The Kommandozeile Starting and konfigurieren can itself the + Edit already. i'll then in the next Version simply yet a switch for additional spending over stdout and a to that hide the + Edit-Fensters install 
MfG
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| Jup.
Very important is it, that no Tastaturabfragen expects go, because otherwise are The IDEs always very schweigsam. 
it would too cool if you for drop the Auftretens of/ one warning/Error a others Exitcode instead of zero use would, so that Xpse then How z.B. at Xpia verlauten can the Error aufgetreten are. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | | clear, no trouble |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/15/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | Hi,
I have the whole now time installed and a Zwischenversion to that testing uploaded:
[...]
there's two new Kommandozeilen-Parameter:
[*:fb0467099d]-hide cache the + Edit-Window and suppress any Messages
[*:fb0467099d]-stdout writes any informations additional into standard-spending To letzterem two Notes:
[*:fb0467099d]the stature is File:row(n):number:Description, to eachone Message becomes one CR+LF written.
[*:fb0467099d]If one whom Inspecor simply with ProfanInspector.exe -f File.prf -hide -stdout from the Kosole from launch, becomes yet nothing outputted (shining windows with GUI-Applications well not To support...). with Pipes (z.B. STARTF_USESTDHANDLES with CreateProcess() functions But naturally. who The [...] (very useful  ) installs has, can it too with ProfanInspector.exe -f File.prf -hide -stdout | cat testing... MfG
Sebastian
P.s.: Why works because with the the HTML not? |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/16/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| Html? most Tags are freigeschaltet. What exactly working because not? oO
to that stdout, I look simply whether a patchen the Exeheaders to ConsolenAPP plainer is?  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | [quote:150a572129]Html? most Tags are freigeschaltet. What exactly working because not? oO[/quote:150a572129]
I wanted to <ul>,<li> and <em> using... The get then simply in the Text displayed...
[quote:150a572129]to that stdout, I look simply whether a patchen the Exeheaders to ConsolenAPP plainer is? [/quote:150a572129]
Well, I know Yes not   |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/16/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| If at all is correct still only one byte not... 
The Tags ul, li and em schalte I strain spare... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | [quote:5cc1dea8ce]If at all is correct still only one byte not... [/quote:5cc1dea8ce]
I habs straight time probiert - functions objectively, but then becomes too at normalen Start from the Explorer out always a Konsole with opened... nevertheless should You The Pipes using and the + Edit-Exe in silence let 
[quote:5cc1dea8ce]The Tags ul, li and em schalte I strain spare...[/quote:5cc1dea8ce]
super, thanks!  |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/16/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| the relieved not strain The work, I must it too first preparing.
means let I the inspector testweise time go through and orientiere me on the Exitcode. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | [quote:f25085cf5e] the relieved not strain The work, I must it too first preparing. [/quote:f25085cf5e]
the understand I do not integrally... Pipes are still really The standard-method, around the spending one others Prozesses abzufangen. How had You, the whole because virtual?
P.s.: I have time one kurzes example appended, in order to show, I my |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 03/17/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(2.350)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia