| |
|
|
Clemens Meier | so far I red have, are nested Procedures not allows. Nested is but well, that itself a procedure within of/ one others befindet. means nested too, that a procedure from the others called becomes? or is the allows?
Procedures, The export go should, must instead of with proc with dllproc definiert go, there tappt im dunkeln presumably differently processing go. If the Call of others Procedures within DLL no trouble is, configures itself the appeal of dllproc(eduren) just as How normal PROCs or must thereby something mind go? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sebastian König | Hello Clemens,
[quote:38387d6e4f]so far I red have, are nested Procedures not allows. Nested is but well, that itself a procedure within of/ one others befindet. means nested too, that a procedure from the others called becomes? or is the allows? [/quote:38387d6e4f] with nested my I, How You correctly. vermutet have, only The Definition of/ one procedure within of/ one others, means something in this manner: CompileMarkSeparation
Proc Test
...
declare a%,b%
...
Proc Output
print a%,b%
EndProc
...
but: allows is the whole with Profan2Cpp nevertheless! with the Translation becomes The Verschachtelung simply (ok, integrally simply is not ) aufgelöst. often is it thereby really necessary (and Profan2Cpp proposes it at discern of verschachtelten Procedures too to), The option any variables global deklarieren To enable.
The reason for is following: in the obigen example-code go in the übergeordneten procedure The variables a% and b% declared. in the untergeordneten procedure go tappt im dunkeln though too using. In (X)Profan no trouble - in C++ to the dissolution the Verschachtelung however already. as they though global To Disposal stand is everything aale .
[quote:38387d6e4f]Procedures, The export go should, must instead of with proc with dllproc definiert go, there tappt im dunkeln presumably differently processing go. If the Call of others Procedures within DLL no trouble is, configures itself the appeal of dllproc(eduren) just as How normal PROCs or must thereby something mind go?[/quote:38387d6e4f] Extra vorgesehen I had these Possibility not (what on it observes, that itself the Syntax-Check over a not defined function beschwert ), but really ought to it no trouble his. I have it straight time with the example from the Profan2Cpp-Help probiert - functions irrespective the Falschmeldung in the Syntax-Check without Problems...
MfG
Sebastian |
|
|
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 05/12/06 ▲ |
|
|
|