XProfan

English

Hello, somehow pack I it with the Zeiger not of C++(Dev C++). it comes here the worth 0 out, really wished I 45 having. who knows itself there from with the Error, whom I with the Zeiger made have? mfg peter Compile Mark Separation declare testram# dim testram#,100 cls test() print byte(testram#,0) WaitInput end proc test parameters testram# int a; a=addr(testram#); a[0]=45;
	09/13/08 ▲ Vollständiges Quote Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

- Page 2 -

and another For-Loop in C++.
Hui, The goes ex, 10x 10.000.000.

can I hardly believe, confirm the please times.
I have 180ms.
Sebastian kannste The time testing, not the The Variable with 10.000.000 wrong go through becomes.

mfg
peter
Compile Mark Separation

declare test%,i%
cls
test%=&GetTickCount

whileloop 1,10,1

    schleife()
    print i%

endwhile

Print Str$(Int(&GetTickCount-test%))
WaitInput
end

proc schleife

    P2CPP: <INLINE_CPP>
    int  test;
    int  wert;
    int  zahl;
    zahl=0;
    wert=10000000;
    for(test = 0; test <= wert; test = test + 1)

    {

        zahl=zahl+1;

    }

    PVAR(i%)=zahl;
    P2CPP: </INLINE_CPP>

endproc

09/13/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

long *pL = (long*)PVAR(ram#);

The commands is not .

mfg
peter

09/13/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

sure the You do not long pL = (long*)PVAR(ram#) mean? Have no prf2cpp to hand...

09/13/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

Have no prf2cpp to hand...

becomes but Time, the it with you standard becomes these Wunderwaffe ala C++ with Profan2ccp.

mfg
peter

09/13/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

long pL = (long*)PVAR(ram#)

Compilerfehler..

Nimm these Variante : char* pL = reinterpret_cast<char*>( adrr);

mfg
peter

09/13/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

Sebastian
König

Peter Bierbachh

long pL = (long*)PVAR(ram#)

Compilerfehler..

Nimm these Variante : char* pL = reinterpret_cast<char*>( adrr);

OK, the reinterpret_cast<>() is in the doing The secure Variante, since the Memory-Variables in the of Profan2Cpp begot code first of all time no Zeigertyp (but in Grunde simply long) are. some Compiler meckern then whom middle-aged C-Style Cast with (long*) on.

your code looks really from

. naturally runs the then very quick. for such things is Inline-C++ though not at all necessary, the the XProfan-code indeed to C++ Translated becomes. You can to that example time this here testing:
Compile Mark Separation

declare test%,i%
cls
test%=&GetTickCount

whileloop 1,10,1

    schleife_prf()
    print i%

endwhile

proc schleife_prf

    var zahl% = 0

    whileloop 10000000

        zahl% = zahl% + 1

    endwhile

endproc

Print Str$(Int(&GetTickCount-test%))
WaitInput
end

If I The Compiler-Optimierungen (with the TuneMake-Plug-In [...]

) deaktiviere, can I none Geschwindigkeitsunterschied To your Variante with the Inline-code More check.

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

OK, the reinterpret_cast<>() is in the doing The secure Variante,

can you for once more a substitute reinstellen, whom then any Compiler receive?

mfg
peter

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

here see it differently from.
installed in the program as C++ and then with Profan2cpp : 143ms Dev C++ and 135ms with BCC55
as normales Program with Profan2cpp prepares : 670ms with DEV c++ and 390ms with BCC55

mfg
peter
Compile Mark Separation

cls
declare bildxy#,laenge%,test%,z%
dim bildxy#,65000
laenge%=65000
test%=&GetTickCount

whileloop 1,100,1

    z%=rgb_farbe_cpp(bildxy#,laenge%)

endwhile

Print Str$(Int(&GetTickCount-test%))
WaitInput
end

proc rgb_farbe_cpp

    parameters bildxy#,laenge%
    declare r%,g%,b%

    whileloop 0,laenge%-1,4

        b%=byte(bildxy#,&loop)
        g%=byte(bildxy#,&loop+1)
        r%=byte(bildxy#,&loop+2)

        if (b%>252) | (g%>252) | (r%>252)

            z%=255
            break

        endif

    endwhile

ENDPROC

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

Sebastian
König

Peter Bierbachh

OK, the reinterpret_cast<>() is in the doing The secure Variante,

can you for once more a substitute reinstellen, whom then any Compiler receive?

The reinterpret_cast<>() ought to really of all Compilern recognized go - he's part the standard-C++ Sprachumfangs.... What exactly functions because not? generally counts, that one itself with Inline-C++ integrally simply on the hold must, what the used Compiler supported. I can only at Übersetzen the XProfan-Codes ensuring, that the Result with all supported Compilern runs.

Peter Bierbach

OK, then comes it well on whom individual case on. Inline-C++ is naturally useful for very geschwindigkeitskritische items - like Inline-ASM in C++. latter went incidentally too inside the INLINE_CPP-Blocks, but I work to Time too at a direct Support of Franks XPIA in Profan2Cpp

.

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

- Page 3 -

functions now everything lovely...

mfg
peter

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

Sebastian
König

Peter Bierbachh

functions now everything lovely...

super, the freut me naturally!

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

both Compiler Dev C++ To 4.9.8 and the BCC55 have I in Test had.
now has the BCC55 always The nose in front had. with the Bereichsvariablenüberprüfung/comparison up to 3x faster. one should itself on the Schleifentest(Whileloop etc) not leave. there was namely always the DEv C++ faster, if it but in that potted went was the BCC55 the faster.

have any my censorial Grafikprogramme with Opengl etc, The here in the Forum to Discussion were/are , fehlerfrei übersetzten can.
an amazing performance too whom direct C++-code einzusetzen was/is a riesengrosser success (after I it understood having).

Profan2cpp is invincible. especially since it The among other things good einfachen C++-Compiler (Dev C++ and BCC55) fehlerfrei bring into action can.
If still The ASM-routines with XPIA/XPSE there reinkommen,...

for my ASM-routines have I me bridge built.
I use The erstellte DLL of XPIA/XPSE with the Def-appeal, no wesentlicher hoisted these reinzusetzen.

mfg
peter

09/14/08 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

◄

1 23