| |
| |
|
Erasmus.Herold | Hallöchen people.
wished me today a recommendation for grabbed via SQL call for.
power your go ahead Beginn once The connections to DB (MySql and Informix) with db("SQLINIT" on and integrally end the xProfan-Program once with db("SQLDone") To?
or kapselt your eure individual SQL Zugriffe in each "Init" and "Done"?
we keep to my example in the same data base. benefit different tables. thanks for Your suggestions moreover.
Greeting |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | I yourself make quite nothing with Databases, would the but dependent upon the Use solve:
If I only occasionally what read or reinschreibe wants, then "auf and zu".
the same, if several User on The DB grab.
If I in short Intervallen on The DB ran must: open, To again a longer interval To expect is and then again To. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
E.T. | So I pers. be always for, the Datei'n (Databases) only for direct grabbed opened go. should mean:
File / data base open > reading > close > the eingelesene Edit > open > write > close. let itself indeed simply into concerned procedure (Daten_einlesen - Daten_schreiben) integrate.
I find the simply safer, what The File / DB concerns. everything what open is, can also quick(it) time integrally broken made go  , must Yes not of Progg his, WIN can the too integrally well 
should nat. permanent data changed go (so in the Sec.-Zyklus) would I The DB too open let (because of the Zugriffs-speed), but then would I of this File / DB at least one Backup to the perm. open make / secure (or time "zwischendurch" secure).
but is only my attitude moreover... |
|
| |
| Grüße aus Sachsen... Mario  WinXP, Win7 (64 Bit),Win8(.1),Win10, Win 11, Profan 6 - X4, XPSE, und 'nen schwarzes, blinkendes Dingens, wo ich das alles reinschütte... | 12/05/18 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Erasmus.Herold | |
| |
| |
| |
|
(452)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia