XProfan

If it you (almost) mere circa Speicheroperationen goes (Bilderzeux?) then becomes PB Prf2CPP take down, but XProfanInlineAsm depends PB ex.

the Simplest against is well Prf2CPP, the fastest InlineAsm, The middle PB. ~rin~

RGH

with Prf2CPP hang very plenty of it ex, whom C++-Compiler You verwendest. The differences are there quite big. of/ one the allerschnellsten is still the Borland Compiler! whom Borland Compiler C++ 5.5 there as Konsolenversion free. The of it begot code lying in the tempo right near on the Assembler.
(The Difference to the others Freeware-Compilern totals oftmals until factor 10!)
and the application of Prf2CPP is too right simply: once into User Menu as Plugin eingebunden reicht one Click, circa from seinem kompletten XProfan 10-Program a speedy EXE To make!

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

moreover must so did i yet say, the it neither integrally so difficult is, ASM To learn. Have for my first driver 3 days used and knew of ASM before quite nothing.

Georg
Hovenbitzer

Vielen Thanks on you all.

i'll well Profan² with Profan2CPP and the Borland Compiler using.
ASM would a good alternative, but moreover I will longer as three days need.

comes with on The list I everything time try would like.

@Roland
gives it already a deadline ex when one Profan 10 buy can ?

Viele Grüsse, Georg Hovenbitzer(Windows XP Pro, XProfan 11.2, Profan2Cpp 1.6a)

[quote:24925e892e=iF]If it you (almost) mere circa Speicheroperationen goes (Bilderzeux?) then becomes PB Prf2CPP take down, but XProfanInlineAsm depends PB ex.

the Simplest against is well Prf2CPP, the fastest InlineAsm, The middle PB. ~rin~[/quote:24925e892e]
and PureBasic InlineASM or DirectASM depends against this ex

12/04/06 ▲

Frank
Abbing

...where XProfan InlineAssembler whom benefit has, all MASM-extensions (z.B. Macros and Highlevel-Syntax) benefit to. The Geschwindigkeitsvorteil is additionally so well How not messbar.

12/04/06 ▲

[quote:5fbab8d131=Frank Abbing]...where XProfan InlineAssembler whom benefit has, all MASM-extensions (z.B. Macros and Highlevel-Syntax) benefit to. The Geschwindigkeitsvorteil is additionally so well How not messbar.[/quote:5fbab8d131]
where FASM whom benefit has, any actually CPU extensions To support, including 64-bit Systemen, ASM-Macros go self-evident too supported, all HighLevel-extensions of MASM Gibts too as Macro for FASM.

yust my 2 cents

was FASM not OpenSource? If Yes, @Thomas. what speaks against FASM instead of MASM in XPIA? Dou you mean You get it there? or Frank?

[quote:5545983286=iF]was FASM not OpenSource? If Yes, @Thomas. what speaks against FASM instead of MASM in XPIA? Dou you mean You get it there? or Frank?[/quote:5545983286]
me are missing The ASM-Kenntnisse and Frank is Yes in MASM solid wellworn. for XPIA would it too no advantages bring.
me I ment only around the allegedly detriments the ASM-Support in PB, The No are

Frank
Abbing

[quote:1fb5d0253d]was FASM not OpenSource? If Yes, @Thomas. what speaks against FASM instead of MASM in XPIA?[/quote:1fb5d0253d]
I see there too no advantages. XPIAs MASM-installation is Yes very simply held. who with Assembler program wants, get the loosly there.

but Thomas ebend meant You yet :any actually CPU extensions To support, including 64-bit Systemen...

Why then for XPIA would it too no advantages bring. ?