XProfan

English

KHR

Hello David

.

Have time a morsel of with the Pipe-pcu experimentiert.

can really almost everything I wants. How always:
it stay Opportunities open. The thing Although as Stack laid out but I would still so gladly optional grab and time ne message between delete can.

and secondly: unfortunately goes tappt im dunkeln under P2CPP not.

would be The somehow portierbar?

Gruß
Karl-Heinz
WIN XP home/Pro / XPROFAN 11 / P2CPP
ATMEL + BASCOM Fan

04/26/09 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

KHR

The thing Although as Stack laid out but I would still so gladly optional grab and time ne message between delete can.

and of course ought to your Program if it Time has whom pile always complete retrench z.B. in a Own list. thereafter is the pile empty and the own list can Yes so much delete or. employ How one would like.

KHR

unfortunately goes tappt im dunkeln under P2CPP not. would be The somehow portierbar?

unfortunately No, the code runs only in a XProfan-Runtime. If you with Profan2Cpp kompilierst then wären Perhaps simple Messages a good electoral:
Compile Mark Separation

var zielHandle&=val(par$(1))
var s$=meinString
var c&=len(s$)

whileLoop c&

    sendMessage(zielHandle&,~wm_user+5555,ord(mid$(s$,&loop,1)),0)

the functions because windows The Messages stackt and one accordingly neither the trouble the global-angelegten Speichers has. so müsstest You only the control zielHandle& in the Empfängeranwendung subclassen and the Message ~wm_user+5555 intercepting - in &swParam standing The Charnummer The as Char to a String add go can. though, rather yet the control is the hWnd the Zielanwendung and the Message ~wm_user+5555 is as userMessage &uwParam declared.

jolly idea really, Perhaps this time a Include produce.

the Zielhandle could in the simplest drop as Kommandozeilenparameter transfer go. ^^

04/26/09 ▲

Vollständiges Quote

Absatzweise Quote Zeilenweise Quote

now hats me strain gepackt what about me wished to a on XProfan 11 adjusted pipe.inc begin, but there's a small rebound. [...]

One Workaround there not because no Flag verrät whether More as 1 UserMessage on the Stack lying, so if More as 1 on the pile lying these first _all erhoben and be in the Order inverse to the processing.

Hmpf!

I werd time look whether my switch {$CPP} yet functions.