| |
| |
|
Roland
Bender | love Community,
these my first Posting. I hope, that your me now not The Rübe from the Schultern hit, but I would like time ask, whether here someone compare between PureBasic and XProfan made has. I Have me XProfan respected and was of it very keen. then Have I me PureBasic respected and .... well Yes.... I found it too very well. i'm now unschlüssig which I prefer should.
yet have I no Full Version bought, weder from the a yet from the others product. i'm simply yet To unresolved and inexperienced with XProfan. Perhaps is these question in this Forum something unhappy, but there a reasonable reason a Language the others vorzuziehen?
what I yet found out have is, that PureBasic several Plattformen supported and the suitable Compiler additional no money cost. (there can too for mac etc. ausführbare programs create.
greetings
Roland Bender
PS: gives it because a Version 10? I have on the pages of RGH whom local had, that it is done, and on the lane into selling. I could but no Possibility find it as Trial download. |
|
| |
| In der Realität ist die Wirklichkeit ganz anders..... *g* | 01/08/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
RGH | [quote:0f9e625d4b=Roland Bender]PS: gives it because a Version 10? I have on the pages of RGH whom local had, that it is done, and on the lane into selling. I could but no Possibility find it as Trial download.[/quote:0f9e625d4b]
Hello namesake,
here there a Freeware-Version of XProfan OGLBasic.
[...] 
The direct Link: [...]
this basiert on XProfan 10 and is of my Erachtens one right guter Entry, around the Programming-Language XProfan to get to know. particularly The new OpenGL-Opportunities for 3D-Applications are OGLBasic complete present! and these PE-Version is for private Use free!
Greeting
Roland
(an Trial of XProfan 10 becomes it in naher future too give. Please yet something patience.) |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 01/08/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | Hello Roland, I bevorzuge XProfan.
it given sure already such comparison - and its over ands over again one hither and thither. 
even if the a the others in the a or others thing technical consider his likes (there's too crazy Free C-Compiler. ;) ), so ists end too always a question the Sympathie - to Language and to Syntax.
look you simply both on and program something with both Languages. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | I can only one moreover write:
would be XProfan not so genial (of simply To extreme everything possible), then would I do not already so saulange (1994? or so) XProfan (former RGH-Profan²) faithfully stayed.
Nimm you as Examples still simply whom Profan-manager of Dietmar horn or my ROC. there siehste what in Profan everything so possible is.
Einziger disadvantage, whom I unfortunately confirm must: In ours countryside search no companies Programmer with XProfan Kenntnissen  - ZU UNRECHT! |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(494)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia