XProfan

Frank
Abbing

Andreas Miethe has two Tools made, circa Incs and Phs directly a Dll to create. The Tools are somewhere on its Page to find, or in the XPIA-pkg undter Tools.

@Frank: It's all right it IMHO circa what completely other!

Frank
Abbing

David IMHO Strutz alias iF: Oh, Yes well. ought to well still gründlicher reading.

Jac
de
Lad

well, i don't know...of command through separated stops I likewise little, How several command through : verkettet. and what to the benefit his, if I the by Header make, instead of a procedure/function of/ one Inc aufzurufen???

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Nico
Madysa

Lies you whom kursiven part the first Postings through.
it'll only the into finished View source transfer, what objectively is used.
Would Perhaps too take off The controls.inc .
not eachone uses any Controls, and there initialized one by Header-appeal only The, everybody can really wants.
there make You z.B. any Procedures To ProgressBars in a Line and the definierst You then for may part as init_progressbars
And if then someone progressbars use wants, must it not yet CustomListBoxen, TrackBars and schieß-me-dead-what-yet integrate separate calls in its Program somewhere simply on:
~init_progressbars

And then has it in its Program solely The ProgressBar-Procedures.

capisce?

Nico Madysa

Jac
de
Lad

Aso, this is naturally again plenty interessanter...hm, is ne Überlegung worth...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Nico
Madysa

Argh, trouble!!
How it shining, there a yet unbemerkten bow with Headern.
it sees so from, as though Profan slight confused does, if in the einzusetzenden Text one = vorkommt, z.B.
Compile Mark Separation

proc_IntToStruct = proc IntToStruct:parameters s#,i%:Word s#,0 = i%:endproc;
proc_dgbBox = proc dbgBox:parameters text$:MessageBox(text$,"Debug-Meldung",4144):endproc

If then thereafter another Definition comes, shining it To creak.
it recognize ~proc_dbgBox not any more

Nico Madysa

Jac
de
Lad

2 Problems:

1. How commit You Parameter?
2. The Header definition becomes always reinkopiert, the could very large programs to follow having...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

11/11/06 ▲

Nico
Madysa

No, You calls The pair How normal Procedures on, since the from the Header only reinkopiert go.
everything functions How normal Incs, with the Difference, that one The Procs, everybody can benefit wants name must
(How supra in the example ~proc_dbgBox ). therefore becomes only the reinkopiert, what too is used. Nix moreover.
Höchstens, that Interpreten Perhaps something longer lasts, because Profan.exe first in the Header look over must (once per genutzte procedure).
but What is with the =-trouble? might Roland or one another something resolution operate? usually goes the einzusetzende Text still up to one Semikolon, or?

Nico Madysa

11/14/06 ▲

Michael
Wodrich

integrally simply:

here becomes probably SubStr$ using. Separator is the Gleichheitszeichen.
Substr$(headerzeile$,1,=) yields The Kennung (linker part)
Substr$(headerzeile$,2,=) yields whom remainder (right part)
(if no further = vorkommt)

I can me incidentally not your idea make friends, then I will rather The DEF functions keep!!!
(Bandwurm-Procedures - who should The because cherish?)

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

11/15/06 ▲

Torsten
Rümker

the whole has but already its Interessanten pages How I find.

momentarily have I it z.b. so that I a functions.inc have in the so quite everything on Schnipseln (ups Proceduren) drin is the I often use.
If I then so far be, that I my now is my Program ready, catch I a new Inc to create in the hold only The objectively required functions drin are.
the would then with Nicos einfall naturally wegfallen, there with of/ one Header File Yes only genommmen becomes what too used becomes.
MfG
Torsten

Ich lerne, ob ich will oder nicht!
Betriebssystem:
- Ubuntu 15.x
- Windows (diverse)
XProfan Version: X2

11/15/06 ▲