| |
|
|
- Page 1 - |
|
ToM | Hi!
have already everywhere geschaut however with nothing a success had, Have strain several projects on the walk under others one AntiCheat Tool Games, everything works, Ports go blocked etc only is the trouble, man kan the program mim Taskmanager terminate and that is Nich so cool.
habs yet with Set_process_ace_in_dacl GuardSheep,system,-,PROCESS_TERMINATE
under others Benutzernamen GEHTS neither unfortunately.
how can to the release ?! would like only NEN Tipp ... use Profan 7.
sunny Regards from Österreich |
|
|
| AMD Athlon 64 4500+ / 1500 MB Ram / Windows Server 2003 Enterprise / Profan 7.0 | 06/05/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
- Page 1 - |
|
| Ah, I sehs strain. You must the right for Account eachone verbiten znd for Account Administratoren. Schreib you same time View source - To same... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Andreas our Tokemon |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| CompileMarkSeparation $I DACL_SET.INC
Def @SetProcessShutdownParameters(2) !"Kernel32","SetProcessShutdownParameters"
ASSIGN #1,"C:TEST.TXT"
CHDIR "C:"
IF @FINDFIRST$("TEST.TXT")=""
REWRITE #1
Close #1
endif
Declare KILL&,ENDE%,ProgrammPfad$,Übergabe$,AT&,TIME&,TIME$
Windowtitle "Kleiner Abschalttest"
Windowstyle 31+512
Window 0,0-640,440
USERMESSAGES $10,$44 $0044=WM_COMMNOTIFY = obsolete in Win32
Case @Left$($WINVER,1)="5" : @SetProcessShutdownParameters($100,0)
GET_Group_Name "Jeder",1,Log_Einträge& Aufruf der DACL_SET.INC zum Ermitteln des Gruppennamens des "Jeder" SIDs.
Set_Process_ACE_IN_DACL "",@$(0),"-UCN","PROCESS_TERMINATE _DELETE",1,Log_Einträge& Die Rechte zum Fremdbeenden eines Processes werden entzogen.
GET_Group_Name "Administratoren",1,Log_Einträge& Aufruf der DACL_SET.INC zum Ermitteln des Gruppennamens des "Jeder" SIDs.
Set_Process_ACE_IN_DACL "",@$(0),"-UCN","PROCESS_TERMINATE _DELETE",1,Log_Einträge& Die Rechte zum Fremdbeenden eines Processes werden entzogen.
Whilenot %MENUITEM=-2
WAITINPUT
Wend
with [...] can you to check on, what there happens... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ToM | Hi!
100 time thanks for your endeavour, to you must one Real respect having, if who windows new writes, then You ;)
but unfortunately working not. on what can the lying ?! the prozess should itself Yes at taskmanager Nich terminate let, but I kanns terminate.
lg tom |
|
|
| AMD Athlon 64 4500+ / 1500 MB Ram / Windows Server 2003 Enterprise / Profan 7.0 | 09/11/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| alas Yes! windows2000 reacted there differently as the XP Taskmanager. under XP go The jeweiligen rights again reset (How one it too with TNT do can) - the goes therefore, because the Taskmanager in the Account the eingeloggten Users runs and Eigentumsrechte on the jeweiligen Process has and so The rights over ands over again Change can.
remedy: your Sicherheitsprogramm must in another Account walk as the Taskmanager, d.h. it must as service (vorzugsweise in the Systemaccount) launched go. go in this Program then The rights prohibited, has the Taskmanager none grabbed More hereon. a right service To write isn't integrally so simply (I habs not yet hinbekommen ). Why is the difficult? the OS wait ongoing on Rückmeldungen the Services - comes sometime no More, becomes the service exits. a ploy can but utilize: one registered one small Program over The API as service. immediate to the Start calls this program one further Program on. the new Program becomes then with the equal Token slip, How the service. windows wait a moment - there no feedback of service comes, becomes your erstes Program exits. of second Program white windows nothing and it's running lüstig moreover. an moreover Possibility, a service to start, would over the DOS-commands AT .
One service with a Window is always one riesengroßes Sicherheitsrisiko, means rather The fingers of it let - because XProfan (ex Version 9) created in each drop Window. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ToM | hmm wow is the tricky
I Have now means NEN service made mittls instsrv.exe, and the service launch quick ne others File, How You said have, and becomes then under the systemaccount carryed out. now can if one The dacl uses, whom prozess nichmehr terminate thanks vielmals!
How meant You with the whom commands AT ?!
achja, wieso the so is, that it same wieda exits and How mans solve can standing here: [...]
only versteh ichs Nich *g* viell take off you
thanks again ;)
greets Tom |
|
|
| AMD Athlon 64 4500+ / 1500 MB Ram / Windows Server 2003 Enterprise / Profan 7.0 | 09/12/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
| |
|
- Page 2 - |
|
|
| As I said, Sicherheitsrisiko deliberating! there one Profanprogramm always Window has, is it - according to Servicepack - evtl. possible, through Messages on the Servicefenster this service To kapern - stranger Applications could itself right simply with steepened Privilegien furnish and anything else on the computer do... Evtl. whom service with of/ one smaller Profanversion compilieren and hereon respect, the it no Window has. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ToM | benuzte profane 7. and if one no cls or print commands types, is Yes no window there or ?! |
|
|
| AMD Athlon 64 4500+ / 1500 MB Ram / Windows Server 2003 Enterprise / Profan 7.0 | 09/12/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| Hello Tom...
just as meant I the. Something like not XProfan make.
Greeting
Andreas |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Hello IF...
understand you not so integrally . |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| These Window my I (attachment).
@Tom: Habs me straight again respected: If the Taskmanager the wished, could it whom Process too furthermore terminate, there the proprietor the Prozesses The group Administratoren is. here should evtl. yet the proprietor angepaßt go, namely on the Account system, then Better get going difficult with the terminate (but vollkommene safety against the turn off in a Adminaccount Gibts anyhow not). |
|
|
| |
|
|