| |
| |
|
Julian
Schmidt | Hey,
white here someone How one relatively slight rausbekommt wieviele Flops(Floating Point Operations Per Second) one processor has.
my so none theoretical worth, separate a in the ongoing-pursued ermittelten worth.
LG
Julian |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
ByteAttack | Since there it first once [...]  
and moreover [...] |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | | bill simply inne nProc pack and dispatching, would I now time value. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Julian
Schmidt | Yes and How find I out wieviele CPU-instructions the processor per Zyklus has?
custom to Berechnung Yes
(CPU-beat in GHz × Number of Kerne × CPU-instructions per beat) / 1000 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| well Is it Unikode!
a ASM-code write and the Number of therein encompassed CPU-
instructions zusammenrechnen and then getTickCount.
Something like How beat and Kernanzahl get prozessorherstellerübergreifend
not always simply out, would I first of all with WMI (WMICodeCreator.exe)
search.
what want letztendlich to achieve? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Julian
Schmidt | wished eig. one small Prog write around the Rechenkraft of Prozessoren the equal architecture vergleichen to.
About WMI I get over root\CIMV2, Win32_ComputerSystem, NumberOfLogicalProcessors The Kerne. and NumberOfProcessors The Number of CPU's out.
The Taktung by root\CIMV2, Win32_Processor, MaxClockSpeed. and there ditto The Herstellerbezeichnung.
iF (21.03.13)
a ASM-code write and the Number of therein encompassed CPU-
instructions zusammenrechnen and then getTickCount.
How Dou you mean the very? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Opcodes (z.B. these 32bit) [...] in a area
write and then Call on the area and already lead Kernel whom Opcode
at least half-way unangetastet the processor To. the would then a
Fleißarbeit and Kenntnisse about ASM wären already helpful, end
the Proc simply whom ret-Opcode so the Call again on richtiger place
zurückkehrt. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Julian
Schmidt | Have unfortunately no Kenntnisse in ASM.
Have me short angeschaut what Opcode means.
On Wikipedia[...] standing here To
One Opcode is a number, The The number one Maschinenbefehls for a designed Prozessortyp angibt. each Opcode becomes one kurzes word or a short cut, one so genanntes Mnemonic, zugeordnet. with the Mnemonics yield the Assemblersprachen.
Versteh not integrally Why one in this drop Operationen as Opcode perform must. The only logische Statement The me falls in is, that no Mnemonic present are over The I the Opcode directly put down could? and the one aimed single Operationen perform must.
Erklär me the time Please.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Have strain something like How a Hexenschuss, login me moreover again if I again sit can. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
ByteAttack | the whole is Obsolet!
The Rechenleistung one Prozessors, says in the entferntesten NICHTS from, over The performance one computers !!!
example: Core 2 Duo with 2 GB RAM, wovon 128 MB 'abgezwackt' go for interne Grafikkarte on the Mainboard.
Core 2 Duo 2 GB RAM with separater Grafikkarte...
or too Assembler:
X6 - six Prozessorkerne, wovon 5 effectively used go, and the sixth core only as 'Befehlswarteschlange' serves.
then was one proud a Co-processor to have. now think one - the there not any more... FALSCH - The mathematical Co-processor is as always there, mere the it in the meantime in the processor with integrate is. one must hierbei only The right Registeradresse address, and the is of manufacturers To manufacturers different.
(a couple little go itself on Cyrix remind)
around the efficiency one computers To evaluate, is it utterly necessary ALLE Komponenten To testing. the goes go, with the CPU, RAM, Grafikkarte, Festplatte... etc... even if my CPU 1.000.000 TerraGigaMega Flops has, what about me but a s3-Grafikkarte with 128 MB have bring it quite nothing.... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Julian
Schmidt | i know the one so imho not vergleichen can which system the faster is.
not only under the aspect the one therefore none comparison over The performance one computers get.
its too so, the The Flops no testimony above make How well The Applications whom processor tätsächlich take advantage of can. so can it his the one DualCore-processor with the Taktung of 3,3 Ghz whom same Flop has like a QuadCore-processor with the Taktung of 1,7 Ghz. and nevertheless the DualCore-processor for want of Multi-Thread-Applikationens More Rechenleistung bring.
me goes it with the whole thing only therefore a Richtwert To get on whom processor one which application on the best executing. with manchen Applications can in the doing on The Flops look. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
ByteAttack | see You! and already (does me sorrow) is again fallacy thereby.
I geb you an example:
I have z.B. Autodesk 3DS MAX and AutoCAD by me walk. Both are very rechenintensive Applications. with MAX uses the program too The Grafikkarte to that to charge, with CAD even not....
hope you know, on what I out wants... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(454)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia