| |
| |
|
Frank
Abbing | I stand to the decision, one large ProSpeed.dll-Update To make or not.
Z.B. there two Ladefunktionen for Bilddateien: the old LoadExtBmp and the modernere and plenty leistungsfähigere LoadExtImage. i'd The first function gladly integrally streichen and only yet LoadExtImage offer. then against müßten any functions How z.B: SizeExtBmp konsequenterweise umbenannt go, and the are not little, means SizeExtImage, CopyExtImage, FillExtImage, ...
The whole action would The ProSpeed vastly übersichtlicher make, but the Codes accordingly inkompatibel. circa the against To wirken could however The Inc-File zunächste both Funktionsnamen to maintain:
DEF FillExtBmp(6) !ProSpeed,FillExtImage
DEF FillExtImage(6) !ProSpeed,FillExtImage
How think your above? is you one small Update rather (2.9 and for bleibende Funktionsnamen) or one large Update (3.0 and for any Funktionsnamen on the Prüfstand and ggf. abgeändert)? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | | Weder yet, Prospeed 2.x becomes hold not any more weiterentwickelt - gives new product Prospeed 3! |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | three voices already? shining so, as have I the point me alike in the survey forget?  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | five voices, tzzz... you had now long enough opportunity, eure opinion kundzutun. Version 3 is accordingly unanimous beschlossen!
the me afterwards bloss none bleats, this and jenes not working More in my middle-aged Source. i will later nothing of it listen!  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| @Frank
[offtopic]
wanted You do not too The LISTVIEW.DLL update and if I me correctly. remember, The INC-File along into The DLL intregieren (...or have You, the already made what about me Schlafmütze have nothing of it come along ?) ??? [/offtopic]
 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
(457)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia