XProfan

iF has but number of times erwähnt, the no real Threads created go. it'll only a similar Funktionalität created. real Threads, without additional DLL or ähnlichem stops I IMHO for almost unmöglich. Support should already in the PrfRuntime integrate his, only by API on my own becomes the of my opinion to nothing.

see I ditto so, wished only once more hereon attentive make, I not any more so often here be and IFs Statement not red have. Aso over again: who think it can alone with jetzigem Profan einn additional Thread produce, is on the Holzweg...

@Thomas: very.

[quote:e01aaea108]your idea and the Umsetzung find I really pointed, you should but already open say, that the what You there beget not plenty with a Thread To do has.[/quote:e01aaea108]ES WERDEN NO ECHTEN THREADS CREATED is IMHO open-said enough.

Hello IF...

I hope, I nerve you not:

there You there Callbacks beget => can ähnliches too with the THREAD.PCU [...]

. with the trouble in Profan hit I already since my Posting here around - having always a suspicion Why the lying, could this but (because of Quelltextmangel) bislang not understand.
my opinion: what no Thread is, ought to neither Thread hot - How should man because there without View source irgendwelchen Problemen on The track come?

be I your opinion, only Thread is nunmal - How everything else naturally too - naturally not eindeutig definiert, umso accurate but describe the name The Opportunities the Unit.

If you mean the The Thread.Pcu because of which not MS-API-Threads created go ihren names misses has, then would I contradict, simply therefore, because the Bezeichnung the Unit moreover there's circa possible short To describe which Opportunities tappt im dunkeln bid. On whom speziellem ways The Unit this does must not The Namensgebung come in - it would kontraproduktiv.

Through the Thread.Pcu can with XProfan threadähnliches behaviour into own Programs produce/program.

[quote:4bf640f867]there You there Callbacks beget => can ähnliches too with the THREAD.PCU occur?. [/quote:4bf640f867]
i know not - the should one simply test times.

[quote:4bf640f867]How should man because there without View source irgendwelchen Problemen on The track come?[/quote:4bf640f867]
Anhand the Threads here's measurable whether a derartige Problematik at all yields, sodaß The from you angesprochenen Problems zumglück (yet?) mere hypothetisch are.

On what want You very out?

I have here time a infamy ausprobiert - by me runs Fehlerfrei - mean You something like?
Compile Mark Separation

 $U thread.pcu = thread.
declare settimer.is&
cls
thread.start 1
thread.start 2
thread.start 3
thread.start 4
P:
waitinput
case %wmtimer : goto "P"
thread.stopall
end

proc thread.do

    parameters n&
    writeini "c:\thread.do.ini","1",str$(n&)=str$(n&)+"/"+str$(&gettickcount)
    locate n&,1
    print readini$("c:\thread.do.ini","1",str$(n&));
    //gemeinheit:

    ifnot rnd(10)

        if settimer.p(500)

            waitinput
            killtimer.p

        endif

    endif

endproc

proc settimer.p

    parameters t&
    case settimer.is& : return 0
    settimer.is&:=1
    settimer t&
    return 1

endproc

proc killtimer.p

    killtimer
    settimer.is&:=0

endproc

from the Ini sustain I:

[1]
2=2/23638218
4=4/23637906
3=3/23637906
1=1/23638218

means 2=2 4=4 3=3 1=1, could one insist it comes too with writeini & readini nothing confusion..?!?!

[quote:878d7d43ab=iF]be I your opinion, only Thread is nunmal - How everything else naturally too - naturally not eindeutig definiert, umso accurate but describe the name The Opportunities the Unit.[/quote:878d7d43ex]
One Thread becomes from the jeweiligen APIs as Thread displayed, has Own Zugriffsrechte and can a own Token having - is means eindeutig, what a Thread is and what not.

i want not, that you whom View source offenlegts - i want but at least know, with I it with of/ one PCU To do have and not of utterly incorrect lowdown go out so I The Problems too on the right place Search and properly hereon react can. If you times the USER32.DLL diassemblest become You check, the WM_TIMER (and WM_SYSTIMER) Messages quite different treats go, as the remainder the Messages. others treatment - others Problems. using You WM_TIMER?

If none vermutet, the a problem evtl. on the PCU lying could, because it of integrally others lowdown ausgeht, become You too no Rückmeldungen in reference on Error receive and the this trouble too with the PCU appear could remaining furthermore hypothetisch...

[quote:0b4d1bf92a]One Thread becomes from the jeweiligen APIs as Thread displayed, has Own Zugriffsrechte and can a own Token having - is means eindeutig, what a Thread is and what not.[/quote:0b4d1bf92a]
Hm nö - there be I do not your opinion. this is Perhaps The Definition one MS-Prozessthreads - but these Defi isn't universally valid and weicht too from the general Threaddefinition ex. (See Wiki) and I eindeutig say that I no real (means MS-Prozessthreads) beget...

I use wm_timer and I me [...]

zunutze made.