| |
|
|
| Hi - I listen over ands over again the real Threads desired go.
I frag me means: what versprecht your you of it - or ists just calm itself real-Threads To wish? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| for many now certainly one reason to that Ablachen - of of my Page from standing these question but really here and wait on a kompetente response: what Bitteschön is really one Thread ? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| One timewise unabhängiges Programmteil. can You you so present as though You 2 Exen (processes) launch, these but as one einziges Program run out - in addition sozuagen. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| thanks iF |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Andreas Gaida | Hi! I find Threads very sinvoll in designed reaches How about TCP/IP Programming. If one several Files at the same time versenden wants can with the Threads in my opinion plenty plainer release as without . Z.B if one a MD5 Checksume a File need The something greater is lasts the already several sec in the the program only so engage is tappt im dunkeln to create and so no others inquire Edit can.there the share the computer with several Processoren or Kernen into next years rise becomes is it too for development of Programs The hoche Rechenleistung need sure of benefit his tappt im dunkeln Multithreating capable To make. i'd it on jedenfall very well find if it possible would XProfan Multithreatingfähig To make where it me thoroughly clear is the Threads not always and everywhere sinvoll are and only from just for fun To use warscheinlich More hoisted means as tappt im dunkeln benefit bring.
MfG Andreas |
|
|
| Athlon X2 4800 , 2GB Ram , GeForce 7800GT Windows XP Pro , XProfan 10 und 11 , Profan2Cpp 1.6b | 04/25/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Nico Madysa | this trouble understand I Profan-Beginner not so right. I mean: might one not simply 2 Exen write, and the desired so alter, that they not eigenständig walk can? one could tappt im dunkeln z.B. so program, that they one Password as Kommandozeilenparameter needed, whom only the Hauptprogramm knows. the would The of my opinion to simplest Variante, but How said, i'm another Profan-Beginner. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| If your one Profan-Compilat on eure Exe commit, have your a Thread (almost, is a Process). only another communication install and ready. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| correctly. Thomas, and The communication Gibts pipe.create . |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Clemens Meier | Hi iF, How I straight with the pursuit what to that sky is a Pipe fixes have, had You already in the year 2005 no Time
among other things one reads to Pipe: [quote:a328548b23]If itself ungetimed talk becomes is the communication well possible slower as getimed![/quote:a328548b23] Mmh, further Documentation to that Timing could I unfortunately not find. means rate I once, if I the Client The Uhrzeit mitteile, is the communication then faster ?
How time I The communication between Client and Server? And if You time Time have (presumably not yet once in the pension ), could you still an example moreover make? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | [quote:92e598cbaa=TS-Soft]If your one Profan-Compilat on eure Exe commit, have your a Thread (almost, is a Process). only another communication install and ready.[/quote:92e598cbaa] the functions of course already fine since the first Profanversion, is by far not so trendy, How real Threads, The with safety plenty aufwändiger to program wären.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 04/26/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| [quote:8d599b4723=Clemens Meier]Hi iF, How I straight with the pursuit what to that sky is a Pipe fixes have, had You already in the year 2005 no Time
among other things one reads to Pipe: [quote:8d599b4723]If itself ungetimed talk becomes is the communication well possible slower as getimed![/quote:8d599b4723] Mmh, further Documentation to that Timing could I unfortunately not find. means rate I once, if I the Client The Uhrzeit mitteile, is the communication then faster ?
How time I The communication between Client and Server? And if You time Time have (presumably not yet once in the pension ), could you still an example moreover make?[/quote:8d599b4723]If I not crazy lying an example in the pkg, I poste too very often Sources here in the Community which The PipeUnit benefit. the whole is ridiculous simply! in the ODoku are The Pipe-command too with small Sources declared. with getimet my I something like: (time so dahingekliert) CompileMarkSeparation or CompileMarkSeparation for both counts: CompileMarkSeparationI hope the helps you. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| [quote:f7ff5323f2=RGH][quote:f7ff5323f2=TS-Soft]If your one Profan-Compilat on eure Exe commit, have your a Thread (almost, is a Process). only another communication install and ready.[/quote:f7ff5323f2] the functions of course already fine since the first Profanversion, is by far not so trendy, How real Threads, The with safety plenty aufwändiger to program wären.
Greeting Roland[/quote:f7ff5323f2]not so Trendy - well true! I use constantly The Possibility a independent Process To produce because the Exe self with Parameter launch. Z.B. too in Okrea. Thats Variante integrally inspired functions understand itself of self - something skillful must one hold with bypass can - but the would with Trendy-Threads Yes ditto the case. |
|
|
| |
|
|